* [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer
@ 2021-04-23 8:36 Thomas Huth
2021-04-23 9:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-23 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2021-04-23 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, Cornelia Huck, Christian Borntraeger
Cc: qemu-s390x, Janosch Frank
When compiling the s390-ccw bios with clang, it emits a warning like this:
pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: warning: indirection of non-volatile null
pointer will be deleted, not trap [-Wnull-dereference]
if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: note: consider using __builtin_trap() or
qualifying pointer with 'volatile'
We could add a "volatile" here to shut it up, but on the other hand,
we also have a pointer variable called "reset_psw" in this file already
that points to the PSW at address 0, so we can simply use that pointer
variable instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
index b9c70d64a5..de1541ea5d 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void jump_to_low_kernel(void)
}
/* Trying to get PSW at zero address */
- if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
+ if (*reset_psw & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
/*
* Surely nobody will try running directly from lowcore, so
* let's use 0 as an indication that we want to load the reset
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer
2021-04-23 8:36 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer Thomas Huth
@ 2021-04-23 9:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-23 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2021-04-23 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, qemu-devel, Cornelia Huck, Christian Borntraeger
Cc: qemu-s390x, Janosch Frank
On 4/23/21 10:36 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> When compiling the s390-ccw bios with clang, it emits a warning like this:
>
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: warning: indirection of non-volatile null
> pointer will be deleted, not trap [-Wnull-dereference]
> if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: note: consider using __builtin_trap() or
> qualifying pointer with 'volatile'
>
> We could add a "volatile" here to shut it up, but on the other hand,
> we also have a pointer variable called "reset_psw" in this file already
> that points to the PSW at address 0, so we can simply use that pointer
> variable instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer
2021-04-23 8:36 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer Thomas Huth
2021-04-23 9:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2021-04-23 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cornelia Huck @ 2021-04-23 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth; +Cc: Christian Borntraeger, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, Janosch Frank
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:36:04 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> When compiling the s390-ccw bios with clang, it emits a warning like this:
>
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: warning: indirection of non-volatile null
> pointer will be deleted, not trap [-Wnull-dereference]
> if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:86:9: note: consider using __builtin_trap() or
> qualifying pointer with 'volatile'
>
> We could add a "volatile" here to shut it up, but on the other hand,
> we also have a pointer variable called "reset_psw" in this file already
> that points to the PSW at address 0, so we can simply use that pointer
> variable instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
> index b9c70d64a5..de1541ea5d 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void jump_to_low_kernel(void)
> }
>
> /* Trying to get PSW at zero address */
Maybe make this
/* Trying to get PSW at zero address (pointed to by reset_psw) */
I'm always getting a headache when I'm reading this file, so let's make
it easy :)
> - if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
> + if (*reset_psw & RESET_PSW_MASK) {
> /*
> * Surely nobody will try running directly from lowcore, so
> * let's use 0 as an indication that we want to load the reset
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-23 10:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-23 8:36 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use reset_psw pointer instead of hard-coded null pointer Thomas Huth
2021-04-23 9:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-23 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.