From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210429190734.624918-2-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210429190734.624918-1-elver@google.com>
To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
verify the siginfo_t layout.
This could have caught that we cannot portably add 64-bit integers to
siginfo_t on 32-bit architectures like Arm before reaching -next:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422191823.79012-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index a3a38d0a4c85..2dac5d2c5cf6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -725,3 +725,39 @@ asmlinkage void do_rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
rseq_syscall(regs);
}
#endif
+
+/*
+ * Compile-time assertions for siginfo_t offsets. Check NSIG* as well, as
+ * changes likely come with new fields that should be added below.
+ */
+static_assert(NSIGILL == 11);
+static_assert(NSIGFPE == 15);
+static_assert(NSIGSEGV == 9);
+static_assert(NSIGBUS == 5);
+static_assert(NSIGTRAP == 6);
+static_assert(NSIGCHLD == 6);
+static_assert(NSIGSYS == 2);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_signo) == 0x00);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_errno) == 0x04);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_code) == 0x08);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_pid) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_uid) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_tid) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_overrun) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_status) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_utime) == 0x18);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_stime) == 0x1c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_value) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_int) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_ptr) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_addr) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_addr_lsb) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_lower) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_upper) == 0x18);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_pkey) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_perf) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_band) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_fd) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_call_addr) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_syscall) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_arch) == 0x14);
--
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210429190734.624918-2-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210429190734.624918-1-elver@google.com>
To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
verify the siginfo_t layout.
This could have caught that we cannot portably add 64-bit integers to
siginfo_t on 32-bit architectures like Arm before reaching -next:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422191823.79012-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index a3a38d0a4c85..2dac5d2c5cf6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -725,3 +725,39 @@ asmlinkage void do_rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
rseq_syscall(regs);
}
#endif
+
+/*
+ * Compile-time assertions for siginfo_t offsets. Check NSIG* as well, as
+ * changes likely come with new fields that should be added below.
+ */
+static_assert(NSIGILL == 11);
+static_assert(NSIGFPE == 15);
+static_assert(NSIGSEGV == 9);
+static_assert(NSIGBUS == 5);
+static_assert(NSIGTRAP == 6);
+static_assert(NSIGCHLD == 6);
+static_assert(NSIGSYS == 2);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_signo) == 0x00);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_errno) == 0x04);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_code) == 0x08);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_pid) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_uid) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_tid) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_overrun) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_status) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_utime) == 0x18);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_stime) == 0x1c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_value) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_int) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_ptr) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_addr) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_addr_lsb) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_lower) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_upper) == 0x18);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_pkey) == 0x14);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_perf) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_band) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_fd) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_call_addr) == 0x0c);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_syscall) == 0x10);
+static_assert(offsetof(siginfo_t, si_arch) == 0x14);
--
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 19:07 [PATCH 1/3] sparc64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets Marco Elver
2021-04-29 19:07 ` Marco Elver
2021-04-29 19:07 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-04-29 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: " Marco Elver
2021-04-29 19:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: " Marco Elver
2021-04-29 19:07 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-26 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:42 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:50 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-26 17:50 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-26 18:29 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 18:29 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-02 8:51 ` Marco Elver
2021-07-02 8:51 ` Marco Elver
2021-07-12 10:38 ` Marco Elver
2021-07-12 10:38 ` Marco Elver
2021-04-30 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] sparc64: " Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 18:11 ` Marco Elver
2021-04-30 18:11 ` Marco Elver
2021-04-30 22:22 ` David Miller
2021-04-30 22:22 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210429190734.624918-2-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.