[PATCH 1/2] cpupower: implement the multi-cpu monitoring of programs

[PATCH 1/2] cpupower: implement the multi-cpu monitoring of programs

[Hamza Mahfooz]

If we look inside cpupower/ToDo, the current 6th point makes mention of
a method to implement multi-cpu monitoring without introducing noise to
the tested program itself.

Suggested-by: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>
---
 .../utils/idle_monitor/cpupower-monitor.c     | 28 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/cpupower-monitor.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/cpupower-monitor.c
index 7c77045fef52..5fc9b38be4e5 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/cpupower-monitor.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/cpupower-monitor.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void list_monitors(void)
 	}
 }
 
-int fork_it(char **argv)
+int fork_it(int cpu, char **argv)
 {
 	int status;
 	unsigned int num;
@@ -315,9 +315,9 @@ int fork_it(char **argv)
 
 	timediff = timespec_diff_us(start, end);
 	if (WIFEXITED(status))
-		printf(_("%s took %.5f seconds and exited with status %d\n"),
-			argv[0], timediff / (1000.0 * 1000),
-			WEXITSTATUS(status));
+		printf(_("cpu %d: %s took %.5f seconds and exited with status %d\n"),
+			cpu, argv[0],
+			timediff / (1000.0 * 1000), WEXITSTATUS(status));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ int cmd_monitor(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	unsigned int num;
 	struct cpuidle_monitor *test_mon;
-	int cpu;
+	int cpu, status;
+	pid_t child_pid;
 
 	cmdline(argc, argv);
 	cpu_count = get_cpu_topology(&cpu_top);
@@ -440,10 +441,21 @@ int cmd_monitor(int argc, char **argv)
 	/*
 	 * if any params left, it must be a command to fork
 	 */
-	if (argc - optind)
-		fork_it(argv + optind);
-	else
+	if (argc - optind) {
+		for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++) {
+			child_pid = fork();
+			if (!child_pid) {
+				bind_cpu(cpu);
+				fork_it(cpu, argv + optind);
+				exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+			} else if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) == -1) {
+				perror("waitpid");
+				exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
 		do_interval_measure(interval);
+	}
 
 	/* ToDo: Topology parsing needs fixing first to do
 	   this more generically */
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 2/2] cpupower: removed a completed task from the list

[Hamza Mahfooz]

Since this task has been completed, cpupower/ToDo should be updated so
that others know not to attempt this task as well.

Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>
---
 tools/power/cpupower/ToDo | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/ToDo b/tools/power/cpupower/ToDo
index b196a139a3e4..39c870ea83e6 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/ToDo
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/ToDo
@@ -12,13 +12,3 @@ ToDos sorted by priority:
   -> This is to move the per_cpu logic from inside the
      monitor to outside it. This can be given higher
      priority in fork_it.
-- Fork as many processes as there are CPUs in case the
-  per_cpu_schedule flag is set.
-  -> Bind forked process to each cpu.
-  -> Execute start measures via the forked processes on
-     each cpu.
-  -> Run test executable in a forked process.
-  -> Execute stop measures via the forked processes on
-     each cpu.
-  This would be ideal as it will not introduce noise in the
-  tested executable.
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpupower: removed a completed task from the list

[Shuah Khan]

On 5/12/21 5:26 AM, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> Since this task has been completed, cpupower/ToDo should be updated so
> that others know not to attempt this task as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>


You have to use real name/address in you signed-off-by. Is this how
you sign your legal documents?

Please refer to:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpupower: removed a completed task from the list

[Hamza Mahfooz]

On Wed, May 12 2021 at 08:45:49 AM -0600, Shuah Khan 
<skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> You have to use real name/address in you signed-off-by.

I have used my real name and email address btw.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpupower: implement the multi-cpu monitoring of programs

[Shuah Khan]

On 5/12/21 5:26 AM, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> If we look inside cpupower/ToDo, the current 6th point makes mention of
> a method to implement multi-cpu monitoring without introducing noise to
> the tested program itself.
> 
> Suggested-by: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>

You have to use real name/address in you signed-off-by. Is this how
you sign your legal documents?

Please refer to:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

thanks,
-- Shuah