From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events.
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 08:23:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520152323.GW9675@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519152247.1853357-1-lukas@herbolt.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Lukas Herbolt wrote:
> As of now only device names are printed out over __xfs_printk().
> The device names are not persistent across reboots which in case
> of searching for origin of corruption brings another task to properly
> identify the devices. This patch add XFS UUID upon every mount/umount
> event which will make the identification much easier.
A few questions....
Are you going to wire up fs uuid logging for the other filesystems that
support them?
What happens w.r.t. uuid disambiguation if someone uses a nouuid mount
to mount a filesystem with the same uuid as an already-mounted xfs?
The changes themselves look ok, but I'm wondering what the use case is
here.
--D
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
> ---
> V2: Drop void casts and fix long lines
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 10 ++++++----
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index 06041834daa31..8f4f671fd80d5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -570,12 +570,14 @@ xfs_log_mount(
> int min_logfsbs;
>
> if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_NORECOVERY)) {
> - xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem",
> - XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
> + xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem %pU",
> + XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
> + &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
> } else {
> xfs_notice(mp,
> -"Mounting V%d filesystem in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will be inconsistent.",
> - XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
> +"Mounting V%d filesystem %pU in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will be inconsistent.",
> + XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
> + &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
> ASSERT(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index e5e0713bebcd8..a4b8a5ad8039f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ xfs_fs_put_super(
> if (!sb->s_fs_info)
> return;
>
> - xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem");
> + xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem %pU", &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
> xfs_filestream_unmount(mp);
> xfs_unmountfs(mp);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 15:22 [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events Lukas Herbolt
2021-05-20 15:23 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-05-21 9:03 ` lukas
2021-05-21 16:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21 16:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-05-21 17:13 ` Lukas Herbolt
2022-06-03 16:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-06-04 0:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-06 14:05 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520152323.GW9675@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.