All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events.
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd3dd62e0926cc2aa7ba6070a88e67ac@herbolt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521160619.GF2207430@magnolia>

On 21.05.2021 18:06, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:03:11AM +0200, lukas@herbolt.com wrote:
>> > Are you going to wire up fs uuid logging for the other filesystems that
>> > support them?
>> Well, I wasn't planning to but I can take a look on other FS as well
>> Ext4 and Btrfs for start.
>> 
>> > What happens w.r.t. uuid disambiguation if someone uses a nouuid mount
>> > to mount a filesystem with the same uuid as an already-mounted xfs?
>> 
>> I a not sure I understand the "nouuid mount". I don't think there can
>> be XFS with empty uuid value in SB. And printing the message is 
>> independent
>> on the mount method (mount UUID="" ...; mount /dev/sdX ...;).
> 
> I meant specifically:
> 
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar /mnt
> <snapshot fubar to fubar.bak>
> 
> Oh no, I deleted something in fubar, let's retrieve it from fubar.bak!
> 
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar.bak /opt	# fails because same uuid as fubar
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar.bak /opt -o nouuid
> 
> --D
> 

Ah, right. Well using -o nouuid might have it's own info/notice in the 
logs
to make it clear.

>> 
>> 
>> On 20.05.2021 17:23, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Lukas Herbolt wrote:
>> > > As of now only device names are printed out over __xfs_printk().
>> > > The device names are not persistent across reboots which in case
>> > > of searching for origin of corruption brings another task to properly
>> > > identify the devices. This patch add XFS UUID upon every mount/umount
>> > > event which will make the identification much easier.
>> >
>> > A few questions....
>> >
>> > Are you going to wire up fs uuid logging for the other filesystems that
>> > support them?
>> >
>> > What happens w.r.t. uuid disambiguation if someone uses a nouuid mount
>> > to mount a filesystem with the same uuid as an already-mounted xfs?
>> >
>> > The changes themselves look ok, but I'm wondering what the use case is
>> > here.
>> >
>> > --D
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > V2: Drop void casts and fix long lines
>> > >
>> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_log.c   | 10 ++++++----
>> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |  2 +-
>> > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > index 06041834daa31..8f4f671fd80d5 100644
>> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > @@ -570,12 +570,14 @@ xfs_log_mount(
>> > >  	int		min_logfsbs;
>> > >
>> > >  	if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_NORECOVERY)) {
>> > > -		xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem",
>> > > -			   XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
>> > > +		xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem %pU",
>> > > +			   XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
>> > > +			   &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > >  	} else {
>> > >  		xfs_notice(mp,
>> > > -"Mounting V%d filesystem in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will be
>> > > inconsistent.",
>> > > -			   XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
>> > > +"Mounting V%d filesystem %pU in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will
>> > > be inconsistent.",
>> > > +			   XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
>> > > +			   &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > >  		ASSERT(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY);
>> > >  	}
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > index e5e0713bebcd8..a4b8a5ad8039f 100644
>> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ xfs_fs_put_super(
>> > >  	if (!sb->s_fs_info)
>> > >  		return;
>> > >
>> > > -	xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem");
>> > > +	xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem %pU", &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > >  	xfs_filestream_unmount(mp);
>> > >  	xfs_unmountfs(mp);
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > 2.31.1
>> > >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 15:22 [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events Lukas Herbolt
2021-05-20 15:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21  9:03   ` lukas
2021-05-21 16:06     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21 16:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2021-05-21 17:13       ` Lukas Herbolt [this message]
2022-06-03 16:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-06-04  0:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-06 14:05     ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd3dd62e0926cc2aa7ba6070a88e67ac@herbolt.com \
    --to=lukas@herbolt.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.