All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Stefan, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error path
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521101523.4f276dac@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvFUasy_8djyvo-fpyboOLGwRV9k_CL-e1nqxcXHkvzOg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 21 May 2021 09:54:19 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 21:45, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Some rollback was forgotten during the addition of crossmounts.
> >
> > Have you actually tested that?  Because I strongly suspect that
> > by that point the ownership of fc and fm is with sb and those
> > should be taken care of by deactivate_locked_super().
> 
> Not quite.  Patch looks correct because destruction of fm is done in
> fuse_put_super(), which only gets called if the sb initialization gets
> as far as setting up sb->s_root, which only happens after the
> successful fuse_fill_super_submount() call in this case.
> 
> Doing the destruction from the various ->kill_sb() instances instead
> of from ->put_super() would also fix this, but I'm not quite sure that
> that would be any cleaner.
> 

As saying in the answer I've just posted, a failure in
fuse_fill_super_submount() causes an actual crash because
fuse_mount_remove() logically assumes fm to already be in
fc->mounts, which isn't the case at this point.

In the root mount case, this is handled by taking back
the ownership on fm, i.e. do the rollback *and* clear
sb->s_fs_info. It seems that the same should be done
for submounts.

> Thanks,
> Miklos


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error path
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521101523.4f276dac@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvFUasy_8djyvo-fpyboOLGwRV9k_CL-e1nqxcXHkvzOg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 21 May 2021 09:54:19 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 21:45, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Some rollback was forgotten during the addition of crossmounts.
> >
> > Have you actually tested that?  Because I strongly suspect that
> > by that point the ownership of fc and fm is with sb and those
> > should be taken care of by deactivate_locked_super().
> 
> Not quite.  Patch looks correct because destruction of fm is done in
> fuse_put_super(), which only gets called if the sb initialization gets
> as far as setting up sb->s_root, which only happens after the
> successful fuse_fill_super_submount() call in this case.
> 
> Doing the destruction from the various ->kill_sb() instances instead
> of from ->put_super() would also fix this, but I'm not quite sure that
> that would be any cleaner.
> 

As saying in the answer I've just posted, a failure in
fuse_fill_super_submount() causes an actual crash because
fuse_mount_remove() logically assumes fm to already be in
fc->mounts, which isn't the case at this point.

In the root mount case, this is handled by taking back
the ownership on fm, i.e. do the rollback *and* clear
sb->s_fs_info. It seems that the same should be done
for submounts.

> Thanks,
> Miklos

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error path
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521101523.4f276dac@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvFUasy_8djyvo-fpyboOLGwRV9k_CL-e1nqxcXHkvzOg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 21 May 2021 09:54:19 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 21:45, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Some rollback was forgotten during the addition of crossmounts.
> >
> > Have you actually tested that?  Because I strongly suspect that
> > by that point the ownership of fc and fm is with sb and those
> > should be taken care of by deactivate_locked_super().
> 
> Not quite.  Patch looks correct because destruction of fm is done in
> fuse_put_super(), which only gets called if the sb initialization gets
> as far as setting up sb->s_root, which only happens after the
> successful fuse_fill_super_submount() call in this case.
> 
> Doing the destruction from the various ->kill_sb() instances instead
> of from ->put_super() would also fix this, but I'm not quite sure that
> that would be any cleaner.
> 

As saying in the answer I've just posted, a failure in
fuse_fill_super_submount() causes an actual crash because
fuse_mount_remove() logically assumes fm to already be in
fc->mounts, which isn't the case at this point.

In the root mount case, this is handled by taking back
the ownership on fm, i.e. do the rollback *and* clear
sb->s_fs_info. It seems that the same should be done
for submounts.

> Thanks,
> Miklos


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 15:46 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 0/5] virtiofs: propagate sync() to file server Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error path Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 19:45   ` [Virtio-fs] " Al Viro
2021-05-20 19:45     ` Al Viro
2021-05-20 19:45     ` Al Viro
2021-05-21  7:54     ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  7:54       ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:15       ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-05-21  8:15         ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:15         ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:23         ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:23           ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:08     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:08       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:08       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 2/5] fuse: Call vfs_get_tree() for submounts Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:19   ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:19     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:28     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:28       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:28       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-22 17:50   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 17:50     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 17:50     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 17:50     ` [Virtio-fs] " kernel test robot
2021-05-22 20:12   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 20:12     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 20:12     ` kernel test robot
2021-05-22 20:12     ` [Virtio-fs] " kernel test robot
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 3/5] fuse: Make fuse_fill_super_submount() static Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 4/5] virtiofs: Skip submounts in sget_fc() Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:26   ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:26     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:39     ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:39       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:39       ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21  8:50       ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21  8:50         ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 10:06         ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:06           ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:06           ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 12:37           ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 12:37             ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 13:36             ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 13:36               ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 13:36               ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v4 5/5] virtiofs: propagate sync() to file server Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-20 15:46   ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:08   ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:08     ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 10:08     ` Greg Kurz
2021-05-21 12:51     ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-05-21 12:51       ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-15 14:14   ` [Virtio-fs] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-15 14:14     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 15:29     ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 15:29       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 15:29       ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 18:57       ` [Virtio-fs] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 18:57         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 19:11         ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 19:11           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 19:11           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-16 19:46           ` [Virtio-fs] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-16 19:46             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-28 15:21       ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-28 15:21         ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-30 17:01         ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-08-30 17:01           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-30 17:01           ` Vivek Goyal
2021-08-30 17:36           ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-30 17:36             ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210521101523.4f276dac@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.