From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Ian Ray <ian.ray@ge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] misc: gehc-achc: new driver
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 22:33:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202105282237.P69ARTyl-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210528113346.37137-6-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4835 bytes --]
Hi Sebastian,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.13-rc3]
[cannot apply to spi/for-next next-20210528]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sebastian-Reichel/GE-Healthcare-PPD-firmware-upgrade-driver-for-ACHC/20210528-193816
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: nds32-randconfig-p002-20210528 (attached as .config)
compiler: nds32le-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/dac014da90e2715a80e4f7139ac40333cd3d4bec
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Sebastian-Reichel/GE-Healthcare-PPD-firmware-upgrade-driver-for-ACHC/20210528-193816
git checkout dac014da90e2715a80e4f7139ac40333cd3d4bec
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=nds32
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/spi/spidev.c:730:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'spidev_probe' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
730 | int spidev_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/spi/spidev.c:793:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'spidev_remove' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
793 | int spidev_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/spidev_probe +730 drivers/spi/spidev.c
729
> 730 int spidev_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
731 {
732 struct spidev_data *spidev;
733 int status;
734 unsigned long minor;
735
736 /*
737 * spidev should never be referenced in DT without a specific
738 * compatible string, it is a Linux implementation thing
739 * rather than a description of the hardware.
740 */
741 WARN(spi->dev.of_node &&
742 of_device_is_compatible(spi->dev.of_node, "spidev"),
743 "%pOF: buggy DT: spidev listed directly in DT\n", spi->dev.of_node);
744
745 spidev_probe_acpi(spi);
746
747 /* Allocate driver data */
748 spidev = kzalloc(sizeof(*spidev), GFP_KERNEL);
749 if (!spidev)
750 return -ENOMEM;
751
752 /* Initialize the driver data */
753 spidev->spi = spi;
754 spin_lock_init(&spidev->spi_lock);
755 mutex_init(&spidev->buf_lock);
756
757 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spidev->device_entry);
758
759 /* If we can allocate a minor number, hook up this device.
760 * Reusing minors is fine so long as udev or mdev is working.
761 */
762 mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
763 minor = find_first_zero_bit(minors, N_SPI_MINORS);
764 if (minor < N_SPI_MINORS) {
765 struct device *dev;
766
767 spidev->devt = MKDEV(SPIDEV_MAJOR, minor);
768 dev = device_create(spidev_class, &spi->dev, spidev->devt,
769 spidev, "spidev%d.%d",
770 spi->master->bus_num, spi->chip_select);
771 status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
772 } else {
773 dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no minor number available!\n");
774 status = -ENODEV;
775 }
776 if (status == 0) {
777 set_bit(minor, minors);
778 list_add(&spidev->device_entry, &device_list);
779 }
780 mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
781
782 spidev->speed_hz = spi->max_speed_hz;
783
784 if (status == 0)
785 spi_set_drvdata(spi, spidev);
786 else
787 kfree(spidev);
788
789 return status;
790 }
791 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spidev_probe);
792
> 793 int spidev_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
794 {
795 struct spidev_data *spidev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
796
797 /* prevent new opens */
798 mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
799 /* make sure ops on existing fds can abort cleanly */
800 spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
801 spidev->spi = NULL;
802 spin_unlock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
803
804 list_del(&spidev->device_entry);
805 device_destroy(spidev_class, spidev->devt);
806 clear_bit(MINOR(spidev->devt), minors);
807 if (spidev->users == 0)
808 kfree(spidev);
809 mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
810
811 return 0;
812 }
813 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spidev_remove);
814
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 24046 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] misc: gehc-achc: new driver
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 22:33:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202105282237.P69ARTyl-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210528113346.37137-6-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4967 bytes --]
Hi Sebastian,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on char-misc/char-misc-testing v5.13-rc3]
[cannot apply to spi/for-next next-20210528]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sebastian-Reichel/GE-Healthcare-PPD-firmware-upgrade-driver-for-ACHC/20210528-193816
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: nds32-randconfig-p002-20210528 (attached as .config)
compiler: nds32le-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/dac014da90e2715a80e4f7139ac40333cd3d4bec
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Sebastian-Reichel/GE-Healthcare-PPD-firmware-upgrade-driver-for-ACHC/20210528-193816
git checkout dac014da90e2715a80e4f7139ac40333cd3d4bec
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=nds32
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/spi/spidev.c:730:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'spidev_probe' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
730 | int spidev_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/spi/spidev.c:793:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'spidev_remove' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
793 | int spidev_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/spidev_probe +730 drivers/spi/spidev.c
729
> 730 int spidev_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
731 {
732 struct spidev_data *spidev;
733 int status;
734 unsigned long minor;
735
736 /*
737 * spidev should never be referenced in DT without a specific
738 * compatible string, it is a Linux implementation thing
739 * rather than a description of the hardware.
740 */
741 WARN(spi->dev.of_node &&
742 of_device_is_compatible(spi->dev.of_node, "spidev"),
743 "%pOF: buggy DT: spidev listed directly in DT\n", spi->dev.of_node);
744
745 spidev_probe_acpi(spi);
746
747 /* Allocate driver data */
748 spidev = kzalloc(sizeof(*spidev), GFP_KERNEL);
749 if (!spidev)
750 return -ENOMEM;
751
752 /* Initialize the driver data */
753 spidev->spi = spi;
754 spin_lock_init(&spidev->spi_lock);
755 mutex_init(&spidev->buf_lock);
756
757 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&spidev->device_entry);
758
759 /* If we can allocate a minor number, hook up this device.
760 * Reusing minors is fine so long as udev or mdev is working.
761 */
762 mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
763 minor = find_first_zero_bit(minors, N_SPI_MINORS);
764 if (minor < N_SPI_MINORS) {
765 struct device *dev;
766
767 spidev->devt = MKDEV(SPIDEV_MAJOR, minor);
768 dev = device_create(spidev_class, &spi->dev, spidev->devt,
769 spidev, "spidev%d.%d",
770 spi->master->bus_num, spi->chip_select);
771 status = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
772 } else {
773 dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no minor number available!\n");
774 status = -ENODEV;
775 }
776 if (status == 0) {
777 set_bit(minor, minors);
778 list_add(&spidev->device_entry, &device_list);
779 }
780 mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
781
782 spidev->speed_hz = spi->max_speed_hz;
783
784 if (status == 0)
785 spi_set_drvdata(spi, spidev);
786 else
787 kfree(spidev);
788
789 return status;
790 }
791 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spidev_probe);
792
> 793 int spidev_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
794 {
795 struct spidev_data *spidev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
796
797 /* prevent new opens */
798 mutex_lock(&device_list_lock);
799 /* make sure ops on existing fds can abort cleanly */
800 spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
801 spidev->spi = NULL;
802 spin_unlock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock);
803
804 list_del(&spidev->device_entry);
805 device_destroy(spidev_class, spidev->devt);
806 clear_bit(MINOR(spidev->devt), minors);
807 if (spidev->users == 0)
808 kfree(spidev);
809 mutex_unlock(&device_list_lock);
810
811 return 0;
812 }
813 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spidev_remove);
814
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 24046 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 11:33 [PATCHv3 0/5] GE Healthcare PPD firmware upgrade driver for ACHC Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] spi: add ancillary device support Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] spi: dt-bindings: support devices with multiple chipselects Sebastian Reichel
2021-06-02 19:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] dt-bindings: misc: ge-achc: Convert to DT schema format Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 16:21 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-09 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-09 15:50 ` Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] ARM: dts: imx53-ppd: Fix ACHC entry Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] misc: gehc-achc: new driver Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 12:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-28 14:06 ` Sebastian Reichel
2021-05-28 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-28 13:36 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-28 13:36 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-28 14:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-05-28 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-28 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-28 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-09 12:42 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202105282237.P69ARTyl-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ian.ray@ge.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.