From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: bring up XDP_TX back to life
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210601113236.42651-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
Hi there,
here are the improvements for handling the XDP_TX/REDIRECT actions in
ice driver. People have been recently reporting that they stumble upon a
situation where no packets are xmitted when they do XDP_TX from their
BPF programs - first patch addresses that.
Second patch handles the case where we could not have XDP ring per core.
Let's consider that as a starting point of fixing Intel drivers against
that scenario.
Note that this is based on the series that I sent two weeks ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210520063500.62037-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
Parametrizing of ice_vsi_cfg_txqs/ice_vsi_stop_tx_rings is needed for a
fallback path.
Thanks!
Maciej Fijalkowski (2):
ice: unify xdp_rings accesses
ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h | 37 +++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c | 5 ++
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 62 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 13 +++-
7 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: bring up XDP_TX back to life
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210601113236.42651-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
Hi there,
here are the improvements for handling the XDP_TX/REDIRECT actions in
ice driver. People have been recently reporting that they stumble upon a
situation where no packets are xmitted when they do XDP_TX from their
BPF programs - first patch addresses that.
Second patch handles the case where we could not have XDP ring per core.
Let's consider that as a starting point of fixing Intel drivers against
that scenario.
Note that this is based on the series that I sent two weeks ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210520063500.62037-1-maciej.fijalkowski at intel.com/
Parametrizing of ice_vsi_cfg_txqs/ice_vsi_stop_tx_rings is needed for a
fallback path.
Thanks!
Maciej Fijalkowski (2):
ice: unify xdp_rings accesses
ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h | 37 +++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c | 5 ++
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 62 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 13 +++-
7 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-01 11:32 Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: bring up XDP_TX back to life Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/2] ice: unify xdp_rings accesses Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 12:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-01 12:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Toke =?unknown-8bit?q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?=
2021-06-08 12:12 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-08 12:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-08 21:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-08 21:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Toke =?unknown-8bit?q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?=
2021-06-03 0:52 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-06-03 0:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-06-08 12:13 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-08 12:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-03 8:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-06-03 8:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210601113236.42651-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.