From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:03:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-12-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org>
In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask,
split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and
security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly
from userspace.
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f6ea3d7a07f2..d151446d5987 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6787,53 +6787,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
return retval;
}
-long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
+static int
+__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask;
- struct task_struct *p;
int retval;
+ cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
- if (!p) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return -ESRCH;
- }
-
- /* Prevent p going away */
- get_task_struct(p);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
- if (p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY) {
- retval = -EINVAL;
- goto out_put_task;
- }
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL)) {
- retval = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_put_task;
- }
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_cpus_allowed;
}
- retval = -EPERM;
- if (!check_same_owner(p)) {
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- goto out_free_new_mask;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- }
-
- retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);
- if (retval)
- goto out_free_new_mask;
-
cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
- cpumask_and(new_mask, in_mask, cpus_allowed);
+ cpumask_and(new_mask, mask, cpus_allowed);
/*
* Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
@@ -6854,23 +6823,63 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
#endif
again:
retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK);
+ if (retval)
+ goto out_free_new_mask;
- if (!retval) {
- cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
- if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) {
- /*
- * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset
- * update. Just reset the cpus_allowed to the
- * cpuset's cpus_allowed
- */
- cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed);
- goto again;
- }
+ cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
+ if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) {
+ /*
+ * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset update.
+ * Just reset the cpumask to the cpuset's cpus_allowed.
+ */
+ cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed);
+ goto again;
}
+
out_free_new_mask:
free_cpumask_var(new_mask);
out_free_cpus_allowed:
free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+ int retval;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
+ if (!p) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ESRCH;
+ }
+
+ /* Prevent p going away */
+ get_task_struct(p);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY) {
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_put_task;
+ }
+
+ if (!check_same_owner(p)) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ retval = -EPERM;
+ goto out_put_task;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
+
+ retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);
+ if (retval)
+ goto out_put_task;
+
+ retval = __sched_setaffinity(p, in_mask);
out_put_task:
put_task_struct(p);
return retval;
--
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:03:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-12-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org>
In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask,
split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and
security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly
from userspace.
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f6ea3d7a07f2..d151446d5987 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6787,53 +6787,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
return retval;
}
-long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
+static int
+__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask;
- struct task_struct *p;
int retval;
+ cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
- if (!p) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return -ESRCH;
- }
-
- /* Prevent p going away */
- get_task_struct(p);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
- if (p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY) {
- retval = -EINVAL;
- goto out_put_task;
- }
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL)) {
- retval = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_put_task;
- }
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_cpus_allowed;
}
- retval = -EPERM;
- if (!check_same_owner(p)) {
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- goto out_free_new_mask;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- }
-
- retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);
- if (retval)
- goto out_free_new_mask;
-
cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
- cpumask_and(new_mask, in_mask, cpus_allowed);
+ cpumask_and(new_mask, mask, cpus_allowed);
/*
* Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
@@ -6854,23 +6823,63 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
#endif
again:
retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK);
+ if (retval)
+ goto out_free_new_mask;
- if (!retval) {
- cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
- if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) {
- /*
- * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset
- * update. Just reset the cpus_allowed to the
- * cpuset's cpus_allowed
- */
- cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed);
- goto again;
- }
+ cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
+ if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) {
+ /*
+ * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset update.
+ * Just reset the cpumask to the cpuset's cpus_allowed.
+ */
+ cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed);
+ goto again;
}
+
out_free_new_mask:
free_cpumask_var(new_mask);
out_free_cpus_allowed:
free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+ int retval;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
+ if (!p) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ESRCH;
+ }
+
+ /* Prevent p going away */
+ get_task_struct(p);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY) {
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_put_task;
+ }
+
+ if (!check_same_owner(p)) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ retval = -EPERM;
+ goto out_put_task;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
+
+ retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);
+ if (retval)
+ goto out_put_task;
+
+ retval = __sched_setaffinity(p, in_mask);
out_put_task:
put_task_struct(p);
return retval;
--
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 18:02 [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 01/20] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 03/20] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 05/20] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 06/20] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 07/20] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 08/20] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 09/20] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 10/20] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 12/20] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 13/20] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 14/20] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 15/20] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 17/20] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 18/20] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 19/20] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 20/20] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-11 16:15 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210608180313.11502-12-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.