From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI: scan: __acpi_device_add() can be static
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:42:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617004201.GA151976@f10223fe78f9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3070024.5fSG56mABF@kreacher>
drivers/acpi/scan.c:660:5: warning: symbol '__acpi_device_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
scan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index be8b149244220..f30ab5a55a9a4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ static int acpi_tie_acpi_dev(struct acpi_device *adev)
return 0;
}
-int __acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
- void (*release)(struct device *))
+static int __acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
+ void (*release)(struct device *))
{
struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id;
int result;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI: scan: __acpi_device_add() can be static
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:42:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617004201.GA151976@f10223fe78f9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3070024.5fSG56mABF@kreacher>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]
drivers/acpi/scan.c:660:5: warning: symbol '__acpi_device_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
scan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index be8b149244220..f30ab5a55a9a4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ static int acpi_tie_acpi_dev(struct acpi_device *adev)
return 0;
}
-int __acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
- void (*release)(struct device *))
+static int __acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
+ void (*release)(struct device *))
{
struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id;
int result;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-16 14:21 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: scan: Fixes and cleanups related to dependencies list handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: scan: Rearrange acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_walk_dep_device_list() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:41 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 15:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 15:28 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device object rescan in acpi_scan_clear_dep() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:48 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: scan: Reorganize acpi_device_add() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:49 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: scan: Fix race related to dropping dependencies Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:55 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 18:04 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-17 0:25 ` [PATCH " kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:42 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-06-17 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH] ACPI: scan: __acpi_device_add() can be static kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210617004201.GA151976@f10223fe78f9 \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.