From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618132826.54670-2-steven.price@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> mte_sync_tags() used test_and_set_bit() to set the PG_mte_tagged flag
> before restoring/zeroing the MTE tags. However if another thread were to
> race and attempt to sync the tags on the same page before the first
> thread had completed restoring/zeroing then it would see the flag is
> already set and continue without waiting. This would potentially expose
> the previous contents of the tags to user space, and cause any updates
> that user space makes before the restoring/zeroing has completed to
> potentially be lost.
>
> Since this code is run from atomic contexts we can't just lock the page
> during the process. Instead implement a new (global) spinlock to protect
> the mte_sync_page_tags() function.
>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Although I reviewed this patch, I think we should drop it from this
series and restart the discussion with the Chromium guys on what/if they
need PROT_MTE with MAP_SHARED. It currently breaks if you have two
PROT_MTE mappings but if they are ok with only one of the mappings being
PROT_MTE, I'm happy to just document it.
Not sure whether subsequent patches depend on it though.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618132826.54670-2-steven.price@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> mte_sync_tags() used test_and_set_bit() to set the PG_mte_tagged flag
> before restoring/zeroing the MTE tags. However if another thread were to
> race and attempt to sync the tags on the same page before the first
> thread had completed restoring/zeroing then it would see the flag is
> already set and continue without waiting. This would potentially expose
> the previous contents of the tags to user space, and cause any updates
> that user space makes before the restoring/zeroing has completed to
> potentially be lost.
>
> Since this code is run from atomic contexts we can't just lock the page
> during the process. Instead implement a new (global) spinlock to protect
> the mte_sync_page_tags() function.
>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Although I reviewed this patch, I think we should drop it from this
series and restart the discussion with the Chromium guys on what/if they
need PROT_MTE with MAP_SHARED. It currently breaks if you have two
PROT_MTE mappings but if they are ok with only one of the mappings being
PROT_MTE, I'm happy to just document it.
Not sure whether subsequent patches depend on it though.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618132826.54670-2-steven.price@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> mte_sync_tags() used test_and_set_bit() to set the PG_mte_tagged flag
> before restoring/zeroing the MTE tags. However if another thread were to
> race and attempt to sync the tags on the same page before the first
> thread had completed restoring/zeroing then it would see the flag is
> already set and continue without waiting. This would potentially expose
> the previous contents of the tags to user space, and cause any updates
> that user space makes before the restoring/zeroing has completed to
> potentially be lost.
>
> Since this code is run from atomic contexts we can't just lock the page
> during the process. Instead implement a new (global) spinlock to protect
> the mte_sync_page_tags() function.
>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Although I reviewed this patch, I think we should drop it from this
series and restart the discussion with the Chromium guys on what/if they
need PROT_MTE with MAP_SHARED. It currently breaks if you have two
PROT_MTE mappings but if they are ok with only one of the mappings being
PROT_MTE, I'm happy to just document it.
Not sure whether subsequent patches depend on it though.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618132826.54670-2-steven.price@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:28:20PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> mte_sync_tags() used test_and_set_bit() to set the PG_mte_tagged flag
> before restoring/zeroing the MTE tags. However if another thread were to
> race and attempt to sync the tags on the same page before the first
> thread had completed restoring/zeroing then it would see the flag is
> already set and continue without waiting. This would potentially expose
> the previous contents of the tags to user space, and cause any updates
> that user space makes before the restoring/zeroing has completed to
> potentially be lost.
>
> Since this code is run from atomic contexts we can't just lock the page
> during the process. Instead implement a new (global) spinlock to protect
> the mte_sync_page_tags() function.
>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Although I reviewed this patch, I think we should drop it from this
series and restart the discussion with the Chromium guys on what/if they
need PROT_MTE with MAP_SHARED. It currently breaks if you have two
PROT_MTE mappings but if they are ok with only one of the mappings being
PROT_MTE, I'm happy to just document it.
Not sure whether subsequent patches depend on it though.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 13:28 [PATCH v16 0/7] MTE support for KVM guest Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 1/7] arm64: mte: Handle race when synchronising tags Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-06-18 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 15:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-18 15:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-18 15:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-18 15:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-21 8:27 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:27 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:27 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:27 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 2/7] arm64: mte: Sync tags for pages where PTE is untagged Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 3/7] KVM: arm64: Introduce MTE VM feature Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-21 9:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-21 9:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-21 9:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-21 9:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-21 9:07 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 9:07 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 9:07 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 9:07 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 4/7] KVM: arm64: Save/restore MTE registers Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 5/7] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 6/7] KVM: arm64: ioctl to fetch/store tags in a guest Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` [PATCH v16 7/7] KVM: arm64: Document MTE capability and ioctl Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 13:28 ` Steven Price
2021-06-18 14:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-18 14:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-21 8:18 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:18 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:18 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:18 ` Steven Price
2021-06-21 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-21 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-21 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-21 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210618144013.GE16116@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.