From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 1/2] init: split get_fs_names
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621145309.GA4995@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNCmTSTcubslmj7k@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:46:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> TBH, I would rather take that one into fs/filesystems.c. Rationale:
> get_filesystem_list(), for all its resemblance to /proc/filesystems
> contents, is used only by init/*.c and it's not a big deal to make
> it
Yeah, unwinding this mess actually is a good idea. I didn't really
look outside of do_mounts.c, but once doing that it becomes completely
obvious.
> int __init get_filesystem_list(char *buf, bool is_dev)
As-is we don't even really need the is_dev argument, as the only
callers wants block device file systems anyway. In fact it would
much rather have a cursor based iteration so that we can skip the
allocation, but that is probaby overengineering the problem.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtio-fs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] init: split get_fs_names
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:53:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621145309.GA4995@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNCmTSTcubslmj7k@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 02:46:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> TBH, I would rather take that one into fs/filesystems.c. Rationale:
> get_filesystem_list(), for all its resemblance to /proc/filesystems
> contents, is used only by init/*.c and it's not a big deal to make
> it
Yeah, unwinding this mess actually is a good idea. I didn't really
look outside of do_mounts.c, but once doing that it becomes completely
obvious.
> int __init get_filesystem_list(char *buf, bool is_dev)
As-is we don't even really need the is_dev argument, as the only
callers wants block device file systems anyway. In fact it would
much rather have a cursor based iteration so that we can skip the
allocation, but that is probaby overengineering the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-21 6:26 [Virtio-fs] support booting of arbitrary non-blockdevice file systems v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 6:26 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 1/2] init: split get_fs_names Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 14:46 ` [Virtio-fs] " Al Viro
2021-06-21 14:46 ` Al Viro
2021-06-21 14:51 ` [Virtio-fs] " Al Viro
2021-06-21 14:51 ` Al Viro
2021-06-21 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-21 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 14:59 ` [Virtio-fs] " Al Viro
2021-06-21 14:59 ` Al Viro
2021-06-21 15:09 ` [Virtio-fs] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-21 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-21 15:22 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 6:26 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 2/2] init: allow mounting arbitrary non-blockdevice filesystems as root Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 13:31 ` [Virtio-fs] support booting of arbitrary non-blockdevice file systems v2 Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-21 13:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-21 14:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-21 14:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-22 8:12 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 3/2] fs: simplify get_filesystem_list / get_all_fs_names Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-22 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-22 8:36 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-22 8:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-29 20:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-29 20:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-30 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-30 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-30 17:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-30 17:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-07 21:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-07 21:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-07 21:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-07 21:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-08 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-08 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-12 18:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-12 18:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-13 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-13 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-17 15:36 [Virtio-fs] support booting of arbitrary non-blockdevice file systems Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 15:36 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 1/2] init: split get_fs_names Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210621145309.GA4995@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.