All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 12/16] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:38:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623173848.318-13-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623173848.318-1-will@kernel.org>

If we want to support 32-bit applications, then when we identify a CPU
with mismatched 32-bit EL0 support we must ensure that we will always
have an active 32-bit CPU available to us from then on. This is important
for the scheduler, because is_cpu_allowed() will be constrained to 32-bit
CPUs for compat tasks and forced migration due to a hotplug event will
hang if no 32-bit CPUs are available.

On detecting a mismatch, prevent offlining of either the mismatching CPU
if it is 32-bit capable, or find the first active 32-bit capable CPU
otherwise.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index dbae006f625f..2f9fe57ead97 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2899,15 +2899,38 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
 
 static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The first 32-bit-capable CPU we detected and so can no longer
+	 * be offlined by userspace. -1 indicates we haven't yet onlined
+	 * a 32-bit-capable CPU.
+	 */
+	static int lucky_winner = -1;
+
 	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
 	bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0);
 
 	if (cpu_32bit) {
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask);
 		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0);
-		setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps);
 	}
 
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, cpu_32bit_el0_mask) == cpu_32bit)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (lucky_winner >= 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We've detected a mismatch. We need to keep one of our CPUs with
+	 * 32-bit EL0 online so that is_cpu_allowed() doesn't end up rejecting
+	 * every CPU in the system for a 32-bit task.
+	 */
+	lucky_winner = cpu_32bit ? cpu : cpumask_any_and(cpu_32bit_el0_mask,
+							 cpu_active_mask);
+	get_cpu_device(lucky_winner)->offline_disabled = true;
+	setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps);
+	pr_info("Asymmetric 32-bit EL0 support detected on CPU %u; CPU hot-unplug disabled on CPU %u\n",
+		cpu, lucky_winner);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 12/16] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:38:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623173848.318-13-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623173848.318-1-will@kernel.org>

If we want to support 32-bit applications, then when we identify a CPU
with mismatched 32-bit EL0 support we must ensure that we will always
have an active 32-bit CPU available to us from then on. This is important
for the scheduler, because is_cpu_allowed() will be constrained to 32-bit
CPUs for compat tasks and forced migration due to a hotplug event will
hang if no 32-bit CPUs are available.

On detecting a mismatch, prevent offlining of either the mismatching CPU
if it is 32-bit capable, or find the first active 32-bit capable CPU
otherwise.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index dbae006f625f..2f9fe57ead97 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2899,15 +2899,38 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
 
 static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The first 32-bit-capable CPU we detected and so can no longer
+	 * be offlined by userspace. -1 indicates we haven't yet onlined
+	 * a 32-bit-capable CPU.
+	 */
+	static int lucky_winner = -1;
+
 	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
 	bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0);
 
 	if (cpu_32bit) {
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask);
 		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0);
-		setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps);
 	}
 
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, cpu_32bit_el0_mask) == cpu_32bit)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (lucky_winner >= 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We've detected a mismatch. We need to keep one of our CPUs with
+	 * 32-bit EL0 online so that is_cpu_allowed() doesn't end up rejecting
+	 * every CPU in the system for a 32-bit task.
+	 */
+	lucky_winner = cpu_32bit ? cpu : cpumask_any_and(cpu_32bit_el0_mask,
+							 cpu_active_mask);
+	get_cpu_device(lucky_winner)->offline_disabled = true;
+	setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps);
+	pr_info("Asymmetric 32-bit EL0 support detected on CPU %u; CPU hot-unplug disabled on CPU %u\n",
+		cpu, lucky_winner);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-23 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-23 17:38 [PATCH v10 00/16] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 03/16] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-06-23 17:38   ` [PATCH v10 12/16] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-25  8:46   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-25  8:46     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-25  9:36     ` Will Deacon
2021-06-25  9:36       ` Will Deacon
2021-06-25  9:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-25  9:49         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:38   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210623173848.318-13-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.