All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 3/9] net: netdevsim: use xso.real_dev instead of xso.dev in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops
Date: Mon,  5 Jul 2021 15:38:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210705153814.11453-4-ap420073@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705153814.11453-1-ap420073@gmail.com>

There are two pointers in struct xfrm_state_offload, *dev, *real_dev.
These are used in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops.
The *dev points whether bonding interface or real interface.
If bonding ipsec offload is used, it points bonding interface If not,
it points real interface.
And real_dev always points real interface.
So, netdevsim should always use real_dev instead of dev.
Of course, real_dev always not be null.

Test commands:
    ip netns add A
    ip netns exec A bash
    modprobe netdevsim
    echo "1 1" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
    ip link add bond0 type bond mode active-backup
    ip link set eth0 master bond0
    ip link set eth0 up
    ip link set bond0 up
    ip x s add proto esp dst 14.1.1.1 src 15.1.1.1 spi 0x07 mode \
transport reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 sel src 14.0.0.52/24 \
dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp offload dev bond0 dir in

Splat looks like:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#5, kworker/5:1/53
 lock: 0xffff8881068c2cc8, .magic: 11121314, .owner: <none>/-1,
.owner_cpu: -235736076
CPU: 5 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/5:1 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168
Workqueue: events linkwatch_event
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5
 do_raw_spin_lock+0x20b/0x270
 ? rwlock_bug.part.1+0x90/0x90
 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x5f/0x70
 bond_get_stats+0xe4/0x4c0 [bonding]
 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0
 ? bond_neigh_init+0x2c0/0x2c0 [bonding]
 ? dev_get_alias+0xe2/0x190
 ? dev_get_port_parent_id+0x14a/0x360
 ? rtnl_unregister+0x190/0x190
 ? dev_get_phys_port_name+0xa0/0xa0
 ? memset+0x1f/0x40
 ? memcpy+0x38/0x60
 ? rtnl_phys_switch_id_fill+0x91/0x100
 dev_get_stats+0x8c/0x270
 rtnl_fill_stats+0x44/0xbe0
 ? nla_put+0xbe/0x140
 rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x1054/0x3ad0
[ ... ]

Fixes: 272c2330adc9 ("xfrm: bail early on slave pass over skb")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
 - no change

 drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
index 3811f1bde84e..b80ed2ffd45e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_parse_proto_keys(struct xfrm_state *xs,
 				       u32 *mykey, u32 *mysalt)
 {
 	const char aes_gcm_name[] = "rfc4106(gcm(aes))";
-	struct net_device *dev = xs->xso.dev;
+	struct net_device *dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
 	unsigned char *key_data;
 	char *alg_name = NULL;
 	int key_len;
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	u16 sa_idx;
 	int ret;
 
-	dev = xs->xso.dev;
+	dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
 	ns = netdev_priv(dev);
 	ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 
 static void nsim_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 {
-	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.dev);
+	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.real_dev);
 	struct nsim_ipsec *ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 	u16 sa_idx;
 
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void nsim_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 
 static bool nsim_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
 {
-	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.dev);
+	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.real_dev);
 	struct nsim_ipsec *ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 
 	ipsec->ok++;
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
	andy@greyhouse.net, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, jarod@redhat.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: ap420073@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2 3/9] net: netdevsim: use xso.real_dev instead of xso.dev in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops
Date: Mon,  5 Jul 2021 15:38:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210705153814.11453-4-ap420073@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705153814.11453-1-ap420073@gmail.com>

There are two pointers in struct xfrm_state_offload, *dev, *real_dev.
These are used in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops.
The *dev points whether bonding interface or real interface.
If bonding ipsec offload is used, it points bonding interface If not,
it points real interface.
And real_dev always points real interface.
So, netdevsim should always use real_dev instead of dev.
Of course, real_dev always not be null.

Test commands:
    ip netns add A
    ip netns exec A bash
    modprobe netdevsim
    echo "1 1" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
    ip link add bond0 type bond mode active-backup
    ip link set eth0 master bond0
    ip link set eth0 up
    ip link set bond0 up
    ip x s add proto esp dst 14.1.1.1 src 15.1.1.1 spi 0x07 mode \
transport reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 sel src 14.0.0.52/24 \
dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp offload dev bond0 dir in

Splat looks like:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#5, kworker/5:1/53
 lock: 0xffff8881068c2cc8, .magic: 11121314, .owner: <none>/-1,
.owner_cpu: -235736076
CPU: 5 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/5:1 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168
Workqueue: events linkwatch_event
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5
 do_raw_spin_lock+0x20b/0x270
 ? rwlock_bug.part.1+0x90/0x90
 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x5f/0x70
 bond_get_stats+0xe4/0x4c0 [bonding]
 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0
 ? bond_neigh_init+0x2c0/0x2c0 [bonding]
 ? dev_get_alias+0xe2/0x190
 ? dev_get_port_parent_id+0x14a/0x360
 ? rtnl_unregister+0x190/0x190
 ? dev_get_phys_port_name+0xa0/0xa0
 ? memset+0x1f/0x40
 ? memcpy+0x38/0x60
 ? rtnl_phys_switch_id_fill+0x91/0x100
 dev_get_stats+0x8c/0x270
 rtnl_fill_stats+0x44/0xbe0
 ? nla_put+0xbe/0x140
 rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x1054/0x3ad0
[ ... ]

Fixes: 272c2330adc9 ("xfrm: bail early on slave pass over skb")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
 - no change

 drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
index 3811f1bde84e..b80ed2ffd45e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_parse_proto_keys(struct xfrm_state *xs,
 				       u32 *mykey, u32 *mysalt)
 {
 	const char aes_gcm_name[] = "rfc4106(gcm(aes))";
-	struct net_device *dev = xs->xso.dev;
+	struct net_device *dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
 	unsigned char *key_data;
 	char *alg_name = NULL;
 	int key_len;
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	u16 sa_idx;
 	int ret;
 
-	dev = xs->xso.dev;
+	dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
 	ns = netdev_priv(dev);
 	ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int nsim_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 
 static void nsim_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 {
-	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.dev);
+	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.real_dev);
 	struct nsim_ipsec *ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 	u16 sa_idx;
 
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void nsim_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 
 static bool nsim_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
 {
-	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.dev);
+	struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(xs->xso.real_dev);
 	struct nsim_ipsec *ipsec = &ns->ipsec;
 
 	ipsec->ok++;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-05 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-05 15:38 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/9] net: fix bonding ipsec offload problems Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 1/9] bonding: fix suspicious RCU usage in bond_ipsec_add_sa() Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 2/9] bonding: fix null dereference " Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` Taehee Yoo [this message]
2021-07-05 15:38   ` [PATCH net v2 3/9] net: netdevsim: use xso.real_dev instead of xso.dev in callback functions of struct xfrmdev_ops Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 4/9] ixgbevf: " Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 5/9] bonding: fix suspicious RCU usage in bond_ipsec_del_sa() Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 6/9] bonding: disallow setting nested bonding + ipsec offload Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 7/9] bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 8/9] bonding: fix suspicious RCU usage in bond_ipsec_offload_ok() Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 9/9] bonding: fix incorrect return value of bond_ipsec_offload_ok() Taehee Yoo
2021-07-05 15:38   ` Taehee Yoo
2021-07-14 22:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/9] net: fix bonding ipsec offload problems Jay Vosburgh
2021-07-14 22:00   ` Jay Vosburgh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210705153814.11453-4-ap420073@gmail.com \
    --to=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.