From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Cc: "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"vincent.whitchurch@axis.com" <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cache: Lower ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 (L1_CACHE_BYTES)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:26:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210706102634.GB24903@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uHgsRacR8hJ7nW-I-pIcehzg-lNIn7NJvaL7bP9tfAftFsBjsgaY2qTjG9zyBgxHkjNL1WPNrD7YVv2JVD2_Wy-a5VTbcq-1xEi8ZnwrXBo=@protonmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:26:59AM +0000, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20210527124356.22367-1-will@kernel.org>
> > Reduce ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 bytes and allow the warning/taint to
> > indicate if there are machines that unknowingly rely on this.
>
> The warning is being triggered on Qualcomm MSM8996, as well as the out-of-spec taint:
Is this booting with ACPI or DT?
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> rtc-pm8xxx 400f000.qcom,spmi:pmic@0:rtc@6000: ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN smaller than CTR_EL0.CWG (64 < 128)
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:45 arch_setup_dma_ops+0xf8/0x10c
[...]
> This warning is triggered with nearly every driver probe, not only rtc-pm8xxx.
I have a suspicion none of the reported devices actually do any DMA, so
in practice it should be safe but we need to figure out why
arch_setup_dma_ops() gets called.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Cc: "will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"vincent.whitchurch@axis.com" <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cache: Lower ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 (L1_CACHE_BYTES)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:26:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210706102634.GB24903@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uHgsRacR8hJ7nW-I-pIcehzg-lNIn7NJvaL7bP9tfAftFsBjsgaY2qTjG9zyBgxHkjNL1WPNrD7YVv2JVD2_Wy-a5VTbcq-1xEi8ZnwrXBo=@protonmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:26:59AM +0000, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20210527124356.22367-1-will@kernel.org>
> > Reduce ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 bytes and allow the warning/taint to
> > indicate if there are machines that unknowingly rely on this.
>
> The warning is being triggered on Qualcomm MSM8996, as well as the out-of-spec taint:
Is this booting with ACPI or DT?
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> rtc-pm8xxx 400f000.qcom,spmi:pmic@0:rtc@6000: ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN smaller than CTR_EL0.CWG (64 < 128)
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:45 arch_setup_dma_ops+0xf8/0x10c
[...]
> This warning is triggered with nearly every driver probe, not only rtc-pm8xxx.
I have a suspicion none of the reported devices actually do any DMA, so
in practice it should be safe but we need to figure out why
arch_setup_dma_ops() gets called.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210602132541eucas1p17127696041c26c00d1d2f50bef9cfaf0@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-05-27 12:43 ` [PATCH] arm64: cache: Lower ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 64 (L1_CACHE_BYTES) Will Deacon
2021-05-27 13:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-27 13:19 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-28 9:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-01 10:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-31 5:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-01 18:21 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 13:25 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-06-02 13:51 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-02 14:09 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-06-02 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-02 14:28 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-06-02 14:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 12:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-04 10:01 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 9:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-06-07 12:01 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 13:08 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-07 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-07 13:56 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 13:56 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 15:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-06-07 15:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-06-07 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-07 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-08 8:57 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-08 8:57 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 15:32 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-07 15:32 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-02 14:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-06-02 14:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-07-06 9:26 ` Yassine Oudjana
2021-07-06 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-07-06 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-06 13:29 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-06 13:29 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-06 13:33 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-06 13:33 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-06 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-06 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-06 14:21 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-06 14:21 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-06 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 14:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-06 14:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-06 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 17:15 ` Yassine Oudjana
2021-07-06 17:15 ` Yassine Oudjana
2021-07-06 20:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 20:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-06 22:27 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-06 22:27 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-07 9:27 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-07 9:27 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-07 8:24 ` Yassine Oudjana
2021-07-07 8:24 ` Yassine Oudjana
2021-07-07 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-07 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-07-07 14:41 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-07-07 14:41 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-07-08 20:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-07-08 20:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-07-09 8:48 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-09 8:48 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-09 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-09 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-06 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-06 16:20 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210706102634.GB24903@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.