All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [ide] b7fb14d3ac: EIP:ioread32_rep
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 10:35:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210707083528.GA353@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707081220.GA31179@lst.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2761 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:08:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:36 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, there's usually a huge offset into the page.  The otherwise
> > > similar ATAPI code actually has checks to chunk it up and not cross
> > > page boundaries, and copying that over fixes the problem.
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> > Your patch made me go "I think it should loop until it has transferred
> > the full 512 bytes", but maybe the caller loops properly?
> 
> Yes, the callers (ata_read_pio_sectors) does).

Actually, not it doesn't. Sorry.  So for a non-aligned large request
this won't work.  So we'll need to actually loop here.

This is probably better and fixes the issue as well (and ATAPI
probably needs the same treatment):


diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index ae7189d1a568..40d2dc3b2989 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -637,6 +637,20 @@ unsigned int ata_sff_data_xfer32(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, unsigned char *buf,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sff_data_xfer32);
 
+static void ata_pio_xfer(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, struct page *page,
+		unsigned int offset, size_t xfer_size)
+{
+	bool do_write = (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE);
+	unsigned char *buf;
+
+	buf = kmap_atomic(page);
+	qc->ap->ops->sff_data_xfer(qc, buf + offset, xfer_size, do_write);
+	kunmap_atomic(buf);
+
+	if (!do_write && !PageSlab(page))
+		flush_dcache_page(page);
+}
+
 /**
  *	ata_pio_sector - Transfer a sector of data.
  *	@qc: Command on going
@@ -648,11 +662,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sff_data_xfer32);
  */
 static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 {
-	int do_write = (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE);
 	struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
 	struct page *page;
 	unsigned int offset;
-	unsigned char *buf;
 
 	if (!qc->cursg) {
 		qc->curbytes = qc->nbytes;
@@ -670,13 +682,15 @@ static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 
 	DPRINTK("data %s\n", qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE ? "write" : "read");
 
-	/* do the actual data transfer */
-	buf = kmap_atomic(page);
-	ap->ops->sff_data_xfer(qc, buf + offset, qc->sect_size, do_write);
-	kunmap_atomic(buf);
+	if (offset + qc->sect_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
+		unsigned int split_len = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
 
-	if (!do_write && !PageSlab(page))
-		flush_dcache_page(page);
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, page, offset, split_len);
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, nth_page(page, 1), 0,
+			     qc->sect_size - split_len);
+	} else {
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, page, offset, qc->sect_size);
+	}
 
 	qc->curbytes += qc->sect_size;
 	qc->cursg_ofs += qc->sect_size;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [ide] b7fb14d3ac: EIP:ioread32_rep
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:35:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210707083528.GA353@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707081220.GA31179@lst.de>

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:08:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:36 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, there's usually a huge offset into the page.  The otherwise
> > > similar ATAPI code actually has checks to chunk it up and not cross
> > > page boundaries, and copying that over fixes the problem.
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> > Your patch made me go "I think it should loop until it has transferred
> > the full 512 bytes", but maybe the caller loops properly?
> 
> Yes, the callers (ata_read_pio_sectors) does).

Actually, not it doesn't. Sorry.  So for a non-aligned large request
this won't work.  So we'll need to actually loop here.

This is probably better and fixes the issue as well (and ATAPI
probably needs the same treatment):


diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index ae7189d1a568..40d2dc3b2989 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -637,6 +637,20 @@ unsigned int ata_sff_data_xfer32(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, unsigned char *buf,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sff_data_xfer32);
 
+static void ata_pio_xfer(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, struct page *page,
+		unsigned int offset, size_t xfer_size)
+{
+	bool do_write = (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE);
+	unsigned char *buf;
+
+	buf = kmap_atomic(page);
+	qc->ap->ops->sff_data_xfer(qc, buf + offset, xfer_size, do_write);
+	kunmap_atomic(buf);
+
+	if (!do_write && !PageSlab(page))
+		flush_dcache_page(page);
+}
+
 /**
  *	ata_pio_sector - Transfer a sector of data.
  *	@qc: Command on going
@@ -648,11 +662,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sff_data_xfer32);
  */
 static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 {
-	int do_write = (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE);
 	struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
 	struct page *page;
 	unsigned int offset;
-	unsigned char *buf;
 
 	if (!qc->cursg) {
 		qc->curbytes = qc->nbytes;
@@ -670,13 +682,15 @@ static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 
 	DPRINTK("data %s\n", qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE ? "write" : "read");
 
-	/* do the actual data transfer */
-	buf = kmap_atomic(page);
-	ap->ops->sff_data_xfer(qc, buf + offset, qc->sect_size, do_write);
-	kunmap_atomic(buf);
+	if (offset + qc->sect_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
+		unsigned int split_len = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
 
-	if (!do_write && !PageSlab(page))
-		flush_dcache_page(page);
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, page, offset, split_len);
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, nth_page(page, 1), 0,
+			     qc->sect_size - split_len);
+	} else {
+		ata_pio_xfer(qc, page, offset, qc->sect_size);
+	}
 
 	qc->curbytes += qc->sect_size;
 	qc->cursg_ofs += qc->sect_size;

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-04 15:00 [ide] b7fb14d3ac: EIP:ioread32_rep kernel test robot
2021-07-04 15:00 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-05 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-05 12:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-05 20:00   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-05 20:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-06 14:36     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-06 14:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-06 19:08       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-06 19:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-07  8:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-07  8:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-07  8:35           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-07-07  8:35             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-07 19:05             ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-07 19:05               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210707083528.GA353@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.