From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci_bar variables
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 09:36:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210711163638.GB2219684@euler> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710195318.jq3xu2gkbttmcsfy@skbuf>
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:53:18PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:25:55PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > The pci_bar variables for the switch and imdio don't make sense for the
> > generic felix driver. Moving them to felix_vsc9959 to limit scope and
> > simplify the felix_info struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
>
> Just one comment below.
>
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h | 2 --
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 11 +++++------
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > index 4d96cad815d5..47769dd386db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@ struct felix_info {
> > int num_ports;
> > int num_tx_queues;
> > struct vcap_props *vcap;
> > - int switch_pci_bar;
> > - int imdio_pci_bar;
> > const struct ptp_clock_info *ptp_caps;
> >
> > /* Some Ocelot switches are integrated into the SoC without the
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > index f966a253d1c7..182ca749c8e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > @@ -1359,8 +1359,6 @@ static const struct felix_info felix_info_vsc9959 = {
> > .num_mact_rows = 2048,
> > .num_ports = 6,
> > .num_tx_queues = OCELOT_NUM_TC,
> > - .switch_pci_bar = 4,
> > - .imdio_pci_bar = 0,
> > .quirk_no_xtr_irq = true,
> > .ptp_caps = &vsc9959_ptp_caps,
> > .mdio_bus_alloc = vsc9959_mdio_bus_alloc,
> > @@ -1388,6 +1386,9 @@ static irqreturn_t felix_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +#define VSC9959_SWITCH_PCI_BAR 4
> > +#define VSC9959_IMDIO_PCI_BAR 0
> > +
>
> I would prefer these to be declared right below
>
> #define VSC9959_TAS_GCL_ENTRY_MAX 63
>
> and aligned with it
Done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-11 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 19:25 [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/8] Add support for VSC7511-7514 chips over SPI Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci_bar variables Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:53 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:36 ` Colin Foster [this message]
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: move MDIO access to a common location Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-10 20:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-11 16:41 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 21:05 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: NULL check on variable Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:47 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 4/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add interface for custom regmaps Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 5/8] net: mscc: ocelot: split register definitions to a separate file Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 6/8] net: mscc: ocelot: expose ocelot wm functions Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 7/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add support for VSC75XX control over SPI Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 17:09 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-11 22:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-10 21:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 8/8] Update documentation for the VSC7512 SPI device Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:58 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/8] Add support for VSC7511-7514 chips over SPI Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:32 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-11 16:44 ` Colin Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210711163638.GB2219684@euler \
--to=colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.