From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
al.grant@arm.com, branislav.rankov@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf cs-etm: Refactor initialisation of kernel start address
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:37:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719193752.GB2255168@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713154008.29656-2-james.clark@arm.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 04:40:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> The kernel start address is already cached in the machine struct once it
> is initialised, so storing it in the cs_etm struct is unnecessary.
>
> It also depends on kernel maps being available to be initialised.
> Therefore cs_etm__setup_queues() isn't an appropriate place to call it
> because it could be called before processing starts. It would be better
> to initialise it at the point when it is needed, then we can be sure
> that all the necessary maps are available. Also by calling
> machine__kernel_start() multiple times it can be initialised at some
> point, even if it failed to initialise previously due to missing maps.
>
> In a later commit cs_etm__setup_queues() will be moved which is the
> motivation for this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index bc1f64873c8f..4c69ef391f60 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ struct cs_etm_auxtrace {
> u64 instructions_sample_period;
> u64 instructions_id;
> u64 **metadata;
> - u64 kernel_start;
> unsigned int pmu_type;
> };
>
> @@ -691,7 +690,7 @@ static u8 cs_etm__cpu_mode(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address)
>
> machine = etmq->etm->machine;
>
> - if (address >= etmq->etm->kernel_start) {
> + if (address >= machine__kernel_start(machine)) {
> if (machine__is_host(machine))
> return PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
> else
> @@ -901,9 +900,6 @@ static int cs_etm__setup_queues(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm)
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!etm->kernel_start)
> - etm->kernel_start = machine__kernel_start(etm->machine);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < etm->queues.nr_queues; i++) {
> ret = cs_etm__setup_queue(etm, &etm->queues.queue_array[i], i);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
al.grant@arm.com, branislav.rankov@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf cs-etm: Refactor initialisation of kernel start address
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:37:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719193752.GB2255168@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713154008.29656-2-james.clark@arm.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 04:40:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> The kernel start address is already cached in the machine struct once it
> is initialised, so storing it in the cs_etm struct is unnecessary.
>
> It also depends on kernel maps being available to be initialised.
> Therefore cs_etm__setup_queues() isn't an appropriate place to call it
> because it could be called before processing starts. It would be better
> to initialise it at the point when it is needed, then we can be sure
> that all the necessary maps are available. Also by calling
> machine__kernel_start() multiple times it can be initialised at some
> point, even if it failed to initialise previously due to missing maps.
>
> In a later commit cs_etm__setup_queues() will be moved which is the
> motivation for this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index bc1f64873c8f..4c69ef391f60 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ struct cs_etm_auxtrace {
> u64 instructions_sample_period;
> u64 instructions_id;
> u64 **metadata;
> - u64 kernel_start;
> unsigned int pmu_type;
> };
>
> @@ -691,7 +690,7 @@ static u8 cs_etm__cpu_mode(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, u64 address)
>
> machine = etmq->etm->machine;
>
> - if (address >= etmq->etm->kernel_start) {
> + if (address >= machine__kernel_start(machine)) {
> if (machine__is_host(machine))
> return PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
> else
> @@ -901,9 +900,6 @@ static int cs_etm__setup_queues(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm)
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!etm->kernel_start)
> - etm->kernel_start = machine__kernel_start(etm->machine);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < etm->queues.nr_queues; i++) {
> ret = cs_etm__setup_queue(etm, &etm->queues.queue_array[i], i);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 15:40 [PATCH 0/6] perf cs-etm: Support TRBE (unformatted decoding) James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf cs-etm: Refactor initialisation of kernel start address James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:37 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2021-07-19 19:37 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf cs-etm: Split setup and timestamp search functions James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-19 19:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf cs-etm: Only setup queues when they are modified James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-19 19:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf cs-etm: Suppress printing when resetting decoder James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-19 19:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf cs-etm: Use existing decoder instead of resetting it James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-19 19:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf cs-etm: Pass unformatted flag to decoder James Clark
2021-07-13 15:40 ` James Clark
2021-07-19 19:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-19 19:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-20 15:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-20 15:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-07-21 8:35 ` James Clark
2021-07-21 8:35 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210719193752.GB2255168@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=al.grant@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=branislav.rankov@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.