All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@redhat.com>,
	Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] virtio-mem: use a single dynamic memory group for a single virtio-mem device
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:52:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210723125210.29987-8-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723125210.29987-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's use a single dynamic memory group.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index 774986695dc4..19036922f7ef 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct virtio_mem {
 	 * add_memory_driver_managed().
 	 */
 	const char *resource_name;
+	/* Memory group identification. */
+	int mgid;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to add too much memory if it's not getting onlined,
@@ -626,8 +628,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_add_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, uint64_t addr,
 		addr + size - 1);
 	/* Memory might get onlined immediately. */
 	atomic64_add(size, &vm->offline_size);
-	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->nid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
-				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE);
+	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->mgid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
+				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE | MHP_NID_IS_MGID);
 	if (rc) {
 		atomic64_sub(size, &vm->offline_size);
 		dev_warn(&vm->vdev->dev, "adding memory failed: %d\n", rc);
@@ -2562,6 +2564,7 @@ static bool virtio_mem_has_memory_added(struct virtio_mem *vm)
 static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_mem *vm;
+	uint64_t unit_pages;
 	int rc;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct virtio_mem_req) != 24);
@@ -2596,6 +2599,16 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_del_vq;
 
+	/* use a single dynamic memory group to cover the whole memory device */
+	if (vm->in_sbm)
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(memory_block_size_bytes());
+	else
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(vm->bbm.bb_size);
+	rc = register_dynamic_memory_group(vm->nid, unit_pages);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		goto out_del_resource;
+	vm->mgid = rc;
+
 	/*
 	 * If we still have memory plugged, we have to unplug all memory first.
 	 * Registering our parent resource makes sure that this memory isn't
@@ -2610,7 +2623,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	vm->memory_notifier.notifier_call = virtio_mem_memory_notifier_cb;
 	rc = register_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
 	if (rc)
-		goto out_del_resource;
+		goto out_unreg_group;
 	rc = register_virtio_mem_device(vm);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_unreg_mem;
@@ -2624,6 +2637,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	return 0;
 out_unreg_mem:
 	unregister_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
+out_unreg_group:
+	unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 out_del_resource:
 	virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 out_del_vq:
@@ -2688,6 +2703,7 @@ static void virtio_mem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	} else {
 		virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 		kfree_const(vm->resource_name);
+		unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 	}
 
 	/* remove all tracking data - no locking needed */
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] virtio-mem: use a single dynamic memory group for a single virtio-mem device
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:52:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210723125210.29987-8-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723125210.29987-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's use a single dynamic memory group.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index 774986695dc4..19036922f7ef 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct virtio_mem {
 	 * add_memory_driver_managed().
 	 */
 	const char *resource_name;
+	/* Memory group identification. */
+	int mgid;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to add too much memory if it's not getting onlined,
@@ -626,8 +628,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_add_memory(struct virtio_mem *vm, uint64_t addr,
 		addr + size - 1);
 	/* Memory might get onlined immediately. */
 	atomic64_add(size, &vm->offline_size);
-	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->nid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
-				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE);
+	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(vm->mgid, addr, size, vm->resource_name,
+				       MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE | MHP_NID_IS_MGID);
 	if (rc) {
 		atomic64_sub(size, &vm->offline_size);
 		dev_warn(&vm->vdev->dev, "adding memory failed: %d\n", rc);
@@ -2562,6 +2564,7 @@ static bool virtio_mem_has_memory_added(struct virtio_mem *vm)
 static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_mem *vm;
+	uint64_t unit_pages;
 	int rc;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct virtio_mem_req) != 24);
@@ -2596,6 +2599,16 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_del_vq;
 
+	/* use a single dynamic memory group to cover the whole memory device */
+	if (vm->in_sbm)
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(memory_block_size_bytes());
+	else
+		unit_pages = PHYS_PFN(vm->bbm.bb_size);
+	rc = register_dynamic_memory_group(vm->nid, unit_pages);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		goto out_del_resource;
+	vm->mgid = rc;
+
 	/*
 	 * If we still have memory plugged, we have to unplug all memory first.
 	 * Registering our parent resource makes sure that this memory isn't
@@ -2610,7 +2623,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	vm->memory_notifier.notifier_call = virtio_mem_memory_notifier_cb;
 	rc = register_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
 	if (rc)
-		goto out_del_resource;
+		goto out_unreg_group;
 	rc = register_virtio_mem_device(vm);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_unreg_mem;
@@ -2624,6 +2637,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	return 0;
 out_unreg_mem:
 	unregister_memory_notifier(&vm->memory_notifier);
+out_unreg_group:
+	unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 out_del_resource:
 	virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 out_del_vq:
@@ -2688,6 +2703,7 @@ static void virtio_mem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	} else {
 		virtio_mem_delete_resource(vm);
 		kfree_const(vm->resource_name);
+		unregister_memory_group(vm->mgid);
 	}
 
 	/* remove all tracking data - no locking needed */
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 12:52 [PATCH v2 0/9] mm/memory_hotplug: "auto-movable" online policy and memory groups David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: track present early pages per zone David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm/memory_hotplug: introduce "auto-movable" online policy David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-26  7:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-26  7:15     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drivers/base/memory: introduce "memory groups" to logically group memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-28 13:39   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-28 13:39     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-28 14:16     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-28 14:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm/memory_hotplug: track present pages in memory groups David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ACPI: memhotplug: use a single static memory group for a single memory device David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] dax/kmem: use a single static memory group for a single probed unit David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-07-23 12:52   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] virtio-mem: use a single dynamic memory group for a single virtio-mem device David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm/memory_hotplug: memory group aware "auto-movable" online policy David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm/memory_hotplug: improved dynamic " David Hildenbrand
2021-07-23 12:52   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210723125210.29987-8-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkedzier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.