From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Provide a helper binary and "library" for SVE RDVL
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728094117.GA1724@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727180649.12943-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> SVE provides an instruction RDVL which reports the currently configured
> vector length. In order to validate that our vector length configuration
> interfaces are working correctly without having to build the C code for
> our test programs with SVE enabled provide a trivial assembly library
> with a C callable function that executes RDVL. Since these interfaces
> also control behaviour on exec*() provide a trivial wrapper program which
> reports the currently configured vector length on stdout, tests can use
> this to verify that behaviour on exec*() is as expected.
>
> In preparation for providing similar helper functionality for SME, the
> Scalable Matrix Extension, which allows separately configured vector
> lengths to be read back both the assembler function and wrapper binary
> have SVE included in their name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile | 6 +++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S | 9 +++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.h | 8 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> index d66f76d2a650..6b53a7b60fee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> fpsimd-test
> +rdvl-sve
> sve-probe-vls
> sve-ptrace
> sve-test
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> index a57009d3a0dc..ed62e7003b96 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> @@ -2,12 +2,16 @@
>
> CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include/
> TEST_GEN_PROGS := sve-ptrace sve-probe-vls
> -TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := fpsimd-test fpsimd-stress sve-test sve-stress vlset
> +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := fpsimd-test fpsimd-stress \
> + rdvl-sve \
> + sve-test sve-stress \
> + vlset
>
> all: $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED)
>
> fpsimd-test: fpsimd-test.o
> $(CC) -nostdlib $^ -o $@
> +rdvl-sve: rdvl-sve.o rdvl.o
> sve-ptrace: sve-ptrace.o sve-ptrace-asm.o
> sve-probe-vls: sve-probe-vls.o
> sve-test: sve-test.o
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7f8a13a18f5d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +#include "rdvl.h"
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + int vl = rdvl_sve();
> +
> + printf("%d\n", vl);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e76dd720b87
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +// Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited.
> +
> +.arch_extension sve
> +
> +.globl rdvl_sve
> +rdvl_sve:
> + rdvl x0, #1
> + ret
This works, but can we use an ACLE intrinsic for this? I'm pretty GCC
and LLVM have been up to date with that stuff for some time, though
you'd have to check with the compiler folks.
Alternatively:
static int rvdl_sve(void)
{
int vl;
asm ("rvdl %0, #1" : "=r" (vl));
return vl;
}
would also work.
&rdvl_sve would not be the same in different translation units, but I
don't think the tests care about that(?)
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Provide a helper binary and "library" for SVE RDVL
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728094117.GA1724@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727180649.12943-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> SVE provides an instruction RDVL which reports the currently configured
> vector length. In order to validate that our vector length configuration
> interfaces are working correctly without having to build the C code for
> our test programs with SVE enabled provide a trivial assembly library
> with a C callable function that executes RDVL. Since these interfaces
> also control behaviour on exec*() provide a trivial wrapper program which
> reports the currently configured vector length on stdout, tests can use
> this to verify that behaviour on exec*() is as expected.
>
> In preparation for providing similar helper functionality for SME, the
> Scalable Matrix Extension, which allows separately configured vector
> lengths to be read back both the assembler function and wrapper binary
> have SVE included in their name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile | 6 +++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S | 9 +++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.h | 8 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> index d66f76d2a650..6b53a7b60fee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/.gitignore
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> fpsimd-test
> +rdvl-sve
> sve-probe-vls
> sve-ptrace
> sve-test
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> index a57009d3a0dc..ed62e7003b96 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile
> @@ -2,12 +2,16 @@
>
> CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include/
> TEST_GEN_PROGS := sve-ptrace sve-probe-vls
> -TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := fpsimd-test fpsimd-stress sve-test sve-stress vlset
> +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := fpsimd-test fpsimd-stress \
> + rdvl-sve \
> + sve-test sve-stress \
> + vlset
>
> all: $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED)
>
> fpsimd-test: fpsimd-test.o
> $(CC) -nostdlib $^ -o $@
> +rdvl-sve: rdvl-sve.o rdvl.o
> sve-ptrace: sve-ptrace.o sve-ptrace-asm.o
> sve-probe-vls: sve-probe-vls.o
> sve-test: sve-test.o
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7f8a13a18f5d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl-sve.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +#include "rdvl.h"
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + int vl = rdvl_sve();
> +
> + printf("%d\n", vl);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e76dd720b87
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/rdvl.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +// Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited.
> +
> +.arch_extension sve
> +
> +.globl rdvl_sve
> +rdvl_sve:
> + rdvl x0, #1
> + ret
This works, but can we use an ACLE intrinsic for this? I'm pretty GCC
and LLVM have been up to date with that stuff for some time, though
you'd have to check with the compiler folks.
Alternatively:
static int rvdl_sve(void)
{
int vl;
asm ("rvdl %0, #1" : "=r" (vl));
return vl;
}
would also work.
&rdvl_sve would not be the same in different translation units, but I
don't think the tests care about that(?)
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 18:06 [PATCH v1 0/3] kselftest/arm64: Vector length configuration tests Mark Brown
2021-07-27 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-27 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Provide a helper binary and "library" for SVE RDVL Mark Brown
2021-07-27 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 10:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 10:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 10:45 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 10:45 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-27 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] kselftest/arm64: Validate vector lengths are set in sve-probe-vls Mark Brown
2021-07-27 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 11:07 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 11:07 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-27 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] kselftest/arm64: Add tests for SVE vector configuration Mark Brown
2021-07-27 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 13:44 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 13:44 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 16:29 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 16:29 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-28 16:37 ` Dave Martin
2021-07-28 16:37 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210728094117.GA1724@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.