From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819182422.GA25923@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:11:25AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
> outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
> value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
> TSC.
>
> Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
> the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.
Oliver,
Can you please describe the race in more detail?
Is it about host TSC going unstable VS parallel KVM_GET_CLOCK ?
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819182422.GA25923@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:11:25AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
> outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
> value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
> TSC.
>
> Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
> the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.
Oliver,
Can you please describe the race in more detail?
Is it about host TSC going unstable VS parallel KVM_GET_CLOCK ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819182422.GA25923@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816001130.3059564-2-oupton@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:11:25AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
> outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
> value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
> TSC.
>
> Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
> the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.
Oliver,
Can you please describe the race in more detail?
Is it about host TSC going unstable VS parallel KVM_GET_CLOCK ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-19 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 0:11 [PATCH v7 0/6] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-19 18:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-08-19 18:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-19 18:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 18:22 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 18:22 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 18:22 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] KVM: x86: Create helper methods for KVM_{GET,SET}_CLOCK ioctls Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values in KVM_GET_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-20 12:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 12:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-20 12:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-24 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] KVM: x86: Take the pvclock sync lock behind the tsc_write_lock Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] KVM: x86: Refactor tsc synchronization code Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-24 9:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24 9:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24 9:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-16 0:11 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] KVM: x86: Expose TSC offset controls to userspace Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-16 0:11 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-23 20:56 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 12:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 12:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 12:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-08-26 20:27 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 20:27 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-26 20:27 ` Oliver Upton
2021-08-29 8:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-02 19:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-02 19:45 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:45 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-02 19:45 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210819182422.GA25923@fuller.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.