From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
Cc: Darren Stevens <darren@stevens-zone.net>,
mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "R.T.Dickinson" <rtd2@xtra.co.nz>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [FSL P50x0] lscpu reports wrong values since the RC1 of kernel 5.13
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:13:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826034310.GA296102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c16c3747-8c6c-fb27-4e07-a893b83a5580@xenosoft.de>
* Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> [2021-08-16 14:29:21]:
Hi Christian,
> I tested the RC6 of kernel 5.14 today and unfortunately the issue still
> exists. We have figured out that only P5040 SoCs are affected. [1]
> P5020 SoCs display the correct values.
> Please check the CPU changes in the PowerPC updates 5.13-1 and 5.13-2.
>
Thanks for reporting the issue.
Would it be possible to try
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210821092419.167454-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
If the above patch is not helping, then can you please collect the output of
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/core_siblings
Were all the CPUs online at the time of boot?
Did we do any CPU online/offline operations post boot?
If we did CPU online/offline, can you capture the output just after the
boot along with lscpu output..
Since this is being seen on few SOCs, can you summarize the difference
between P5040 and P5020.
>
> [1] https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=53775#p53775
>
>
> On 09 August 2021 um 02:37 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Lscpu reports wrong values [1] since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 on my FSL
> > P5040 Cyrus+ board (A-EON AmigaOne X5000). [2]
> > The differences are:
> >
> > Since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 (wrong values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 1
> > Socket(s): 3
> >
I know that the socket count was off by 1, but I cant explain how its off by
2 here.
> > Before (correct values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 4
> > Socket(s): 1
> >
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
Cc: Darren Stevens <darren@stevens-zone.net>,
mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "R.T.Dickinson" <rtd2@xtra.co.nz>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [FSL P50x0] lscpu reports wrong values since the RC1 of kernel 5.13
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:13:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826034310.GA296102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c16c3747-8c6c-fb27-4e07-a893b83a5580@xenosoft.de>
* Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> [2021-08-16 14:29:21]:
Hi Christian,
> I tested the RC6 of kernel 5.14 today and unfortunately the issue still
> exists. We have figured out that only P5040 SoCs are affected. [1]
> P5020 SoCs display the correct values.
> Please check the CPU changes in the PowerPC updates 5.13-1 and 5.13-2.
>
Thanks for reporting the issue.
Would it be possible to try
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210821092419.167454-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
If the above patch is not helping, then can you please collect the output of
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/core_siblings
Were all the CPUs online at the time of boot?
Did we do any CPU online/offline operations post boot?
If we did CPU online/offline, can you capture the output just after the
boot along with lscpu output..
Since this is being seen on few SOCs, can you summarize the difference
between P5040 and P5020.
>
> [1] https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=53775#p53775
>
>
> On 09 August 2021 um 02:37 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Lscpu reports wrong values [1] since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 on my FSL
> > P5040 Cyrus+ board (A-EON AmigaOne X5000). [2]
> > The differences are:
> >
> > Since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 (wrong values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 1
> > Socket(s): 3
> >
I know that the socket count was off by 1, but I cant explain how its off by
2 here.
> > Before (correct values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 4
> > Socket(s): 1
> >
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 12:37 [FSL P50x0] lscpu reports wrong values since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 Christian Zigotzky
2021-08-16 12:29 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-08-26 3:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2021-08-26 3:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-27 18:32 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-08-27 18:32 ` Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210826034310.GA296102@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=darren@stevens-zone.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madskateman@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rtd2@xtra.co.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.