From: Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Change references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 22:42:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910024256.7615-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910024256.7615-1-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Since commit 1243dc518c9d ("cgroup/cpuset: Convert cpuset_mutex to
percpu_rwsem"), cpuset_mutex has been replaced by cpuset_rwsem which is
a percpu rwsem. However, the comments in kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c still
reference cpuset_mutex which are now incorrect.
Change all the references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem.
Fixes: 1243dc518c9d ("cgroup/cpuset: Convert cpuset_mutex to percpu_rwsem")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index df1ccf4558f8..2a9695ccb65f 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -311,17 +311,19 @@ static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
if (is_cpuset_online(((des_cs) = css_cs((pos_css)))))
/*
- * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_mutex and
+ * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_rwsem and
* callback_lock. We also require taking task_lock() when dereferencing a
* task's cpuset pointer. See "The task_lock() exception", at the end of this
- * comment.
+ * comment. The cpuset code uses only cpuset_rwsem write lock. Other
+ * kernel subsystems can use cpuset_read_lock()/cpuset_read_unlock() to
+ * prevent change to cpuset structures.
*
* A task must hold both locks to modify cpusets. If a task holds
- * cpuset_mutex, then it blocks others wanting that mutex, ensuring that it
+ * cpuset_rwsem, it blocks others wanting that rwsem, ensuring that it
* is the only task able to also acquire callback_lock and be able to
* modify cpusets. It can perform various checks on the cpuset structure
* first, knowing nothing will change. It can also allocate memory while
- * just holding cpuset_mutex. While it is performing these checks, various
+ * just holding cpuset_rwsem. While it is performing these checks, various
* callback routines can briefly acquire callback_lock to query cpusets.
* Once it is ready to make the changes, it takes callback_lock, blocking
* everyone else.
@@ -393,7 +395,7 @@ static inline bool is_in_v2_mode(void)
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of cpu_online_mask.
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct cpumask *pmask)
@@ -435,7 +437,7 @@ static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of node_states[N_MEMORY].
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
{
@@ -447,7 +449,7 @@ static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
/*
* update task's spread flag if cpuset's page/slab spread flag is set
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -468,7 +470,7 @@ static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
*
* One cpuset is a subset of another if all its allowed CPUs and
* Memory Nodes are a subset of the other, and its exclusive flags
- * are only set if the other's are set. Call holding cpuset_mutex.
+ * are only set if the other's are set. Call holding cpuset_rwsem.
*/
static int is_cpuset_subset(const struct cpuset *p, const struct cpuset *q)
@@ -577,7 +579,7 @@ static inline void free_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
* If we replaced the flag and mask values of the current cpuset
* (cur) with those values in the trial cpuset (trial), would
* our various subset and exclusive rules still be valid? Presumes
- * cpuset_mutex held.
+ * cpuset_rwsem held.
*
* 'cur' is the address of an actual, in-use cpuset. Operations
* such as list traversal that depend on the actual address of the
@@ -700,7 +702,7 @@ static void update_domain_attr_tree(struct sched_domain_attr *dattr,
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-/* Must be called with cpuset_mutex held. */
+/* Must be called with cpuset_rwsem held. */
static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
{
/* jump label reference count + the top-level cpuset */
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
* domains when operating in the severe memory shortage situations
* that could cause allocation failures below.
*
- * Must be called with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Must be called with cpuset_rwsem held.
*
* The three key local variables below are:
* cp - cpuset pointer, used (together with pos_css) to perform a
@@ -1005,7 +1007,7 @@ partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
* 'cpus' is removed, then call this routine to rebuild the
* scheduler's dynamic sched domains.
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held. Takes cpus_read_lock().
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held. Takes cpus_read_lock().
*/
static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
{
@@ -1078,7 +1080,7 @@ void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's cpus_allowed mask needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its cpus_allowed to the
- * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_mutex held,
+ * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_rwsem held,
* cpuset membership stays stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs)
@@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset, int cmd,
*
* On legacy hierarchy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed.
*
- * Called with cpuset_mutex held
+ * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
*/
static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
@@ -1704,12 +1706,12 @@ static void *cpuset_being_rebound;
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's mems_allowed mask needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its mems_allowed to the
- * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_mutex held,
+ * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_rwsem held,
* cpuset membership stays stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
{
- static nodemask_t newmems; /* protected by cpuset_mutex */
+ static nodemask_t newmems; /* protected by cpuset_rwsem */
struct css_task_iter it;
struct task_struct *task;
@@ -1722,7 +1724,7 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
* take while holding tasklist_lock. Forks can happen - the
* mpol_dup() cpuset_being_rebound check will catch such forks,
* and rebind their vma mempolicies too. Because we still hold
- * the global cpuset_mutex, we know that no other rebind effort
+ * the global cpuset_rwsem, we know that no other rebind effort
* will be contending for the global variable cpuset_being_rebound.
* It's ok if we rebind the same mm twice; mpol_rebind_mm()
* is idempotent. Also migrate pages in each mm to new nodes.
@@ -1768,7 +1770,7 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
*
* On legacy hierarchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
*
- * Called with cpuset_mutex held
+ * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
*/
static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
{
@@ -1821,7 +1823,7 @@ static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
* mempolicies and if the cpuset is marked 'memory_migrate',
* migrate the tasks pages to the new memory.
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held. May take callback_lock during call.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held. May take callback_lock during call.
* Will take tasklist_lock, scan tasklist for tasks in cpuset cs,
* lock each such tasks mm->mmap_lock, scan its vma's and rebind
* their mempolicies to the cpusets new mems_allowed.
@@ -1911,7 +1913,7 @@ static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val)
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's spread flags needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its spread flags. As this
- * function is called with cpuset_mutex held, cpuset membership stays
+ * function is called with cpuset_rwsem held, cpuset membership stays
* stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_flags(struct cpuset *cs)
@@ -1931,7 +1933,7 @@ static void update_tasks_flags(struct cpuset *cs)
* cs: the cpuset to update
* turning_on: whether the flag is being set or cleared
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t bit, struct cpuset *cs,
@@ -1980,7 +1982,7 @@ static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t bit, struct cpuset *cs,
* cs: the cpuset to update
* new_prs: new partition root state
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
{
@@ -2167,7 +2169,7 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
static struct cpuset *cpuset_attach_old_cs;
-/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_mutex held */
+/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_rwsem held */
static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
@@ -2219,7 +2221,7 @@ static void cpuset_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
}
/*
- * Protected by cpuset_mutex. cpus_attach is used only by cpuset_attach()
+ * Protected by cpuset_rwsem. cpus_attach is used only by cpuset_attach()
* but we can't allocate it dynamically there. Define it global and
* allocate from cpuset_init().
*/
@@ -2227,7 +2229,7 @@ static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;
static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
- /* static buf protected by cpuset_mutex */
+ /* static buf protected by cpuset_rwsem */
static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_to;
struct task_struct *task;
struct task_struct *leader;
@@ -2417,7 +2419,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
* operation like this one can lead to a deadlock through kernfs
* active_ref protection. Let's break the protection. Losing the
* protection is okay as we check whether @cs is online after
- * grabbing cpuset_mutex anyway. This only happens on the legacy
+ * grabbing cpuset_rwsem anyway. This only happens on the legacy
* hierarchies.
*/
css_get(&cs->css);
@@ -3672,7 +3674,7 @@ void __cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void)
* - Used for /proc/<pid>/cpuset.
* - No need to task_lock(tsk) on this tsk->cpuset reference, as it
* doesn't really matter if tsk->cpuset changes after we read it,
- * and we take cpuset_mutex, keeping cpuset_attach() from changing it
+ * and we take cpuset_rwsem, keeping cpuset_attach() from changing it
* anyway.
*/
int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
--
2.18.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Change references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 22:42:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910024256.7615-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910024256.7615-1-longman@redhat.com>
Since commit 1243dc518c9d ("cgroup/cpuset: Convert cpuset_mutex to
percpu_rwsem"), cpuset_mutex has been replaced by cpuset_rwsem which is
a percpu rwsem. However, the comments in kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c still
reference cpuset_mutex which are now incorrect.
Change all the references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem.
Fixes: 1243dc518c9d ("cgroup/cpuset: Convert cpuset_mutex to percpu_rwsem")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index df1ccf4558f8..2a9695ccb65f 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -311,17 +311,19 @@ static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
if (is_cpuset_online(((des_cs) = css_cs((pos_css)))))
/*
- * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_mutex and
+ * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_rwsem and
* callback_lock. We also require taking task_lock() when dereferencing a
* task's cpuset pointer. See "The task_lock() exception", at the end of this
- * comment.
+ * comment. The cpuset code uses only cpuset_rwsem write lock. Other
+ * kernel subsystems can use cpuset_read_lock()/cpuset_read_unlock() to
+ * prevent change to cpuset structures.
*
* A task must hold both locks to modify cpusets. If a task holds
- * cpuset_mutex, then it blocks others wanting that mutex, ensuring that it
+ * cpuset_rwsem, it blocks others wanting that rwsem, ensuring that it
* is the only task able to also acquire callback_lock and be able to
* modify cpusets. It can perform various checks on the cpuset structure
* first, knowing nothing will change. It can also allocate memory while
- * just holding cpuset_mutex. While it is performing these checks, various
+ * just holding cpuset_rwsem. While it is performing these checks, various
* callback routines can briefly acquire callback_lock to query cpusets.
* Once it is ready to make the changes, it takes callback_lock, blocking
* everyone else.
@@ -393,7 +395,7 @@ static inline bool is_in_v2_mode(void)
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of cpu_online_mask.
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct cpumask *pmask)
@@ -435,7 +437,7 @@ static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk,
* One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset
* of node_states[N_MEMORY].
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
{
@@ -447,7 +449,7 @@ static void guarantee_online_mems(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
/*
* update task's spread flag if cpuset's page/slab spread flag is set
*
- * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -468,7 +470,7 @@ static void cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(struct cpuset *cs,
*
* One cpuset is a subset of another if all its allowed CPUs and
* Memory Nodes are a subset of the other, and its exclusive flags
- * are only set if the other's are set. Call holding cpuset_mutex.
+ * are only set if the other's are set. Call holding cpuset_rwsem.
*/
static int is_cpuset_subset(const struct cpuset *p, const struct cpuset *q)
@@ -577,7 +579,7 @@ static inline void free_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
* If we replaced the flag and mask values of the current cpuset
* (cur) with those values in the trial cpuset (trial), would
* our various subset and exclusive rules still be valid? Presumes
- * cpuset_mutex held.
+ * cpuset_rwsem held.
*
* 'cur' is the address of an actual, in-use cpuset. Operations
* such as list traversal that depend on the actual address of the
@@ -700,7 +702,7 @@ static void update_domain_attr_tree(struct sched_domain_attr *dattr,
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-/* Must be called with cpuset_mutex held. */
+/* Must be called with cpuset_rwsem held. */
static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
{
/* jump label reference count + the top-level cpuset */
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
* domains when operating in the severe memory shortage situations
* that could cause allocation failures below.
*
- * Must be called with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Must be called with cpuset_rwsem held.
*
* The three key local variables below are:
* cp - cpuset pointer, used (together with pos_css) to perform a
@@ -1005,7 +1007,7 @@ partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
* 'cpus' is removed, then call this routine to rebuild the
* scheduler's dynamic sched domains.
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held. Takes cpus_read_lock().
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held. Takes cpus_read_lock().
*/
static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
{
@@ -1078,7 +1080,7 @@ void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's cpus_allowed mask needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its cpus_allowed to the
- * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_mutex held,
+ * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_rwsem held,
* cpuset membership stays stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs)
@@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset, int cmd,
*
* On legacy hierarchy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed.
*
- * Called with cpuset_mutex held
+ * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
*/
static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
@@ -1704,12 +1706,12 @@ static void *cpuset_being_rebound;
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's mems_allowed mask needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its mems_allowed to the
- * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_mutex held,
+ * effective cpuset's. As this function is called with cpuset_rwsem held,
* cpuset membership stays stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
{
- static nodemask_t newmems; /* protected by cpuset_mutex */
+ static nodemask_t newmems; /* protected by cpuset_rwsem */
struct css_task_iter it;
struct task_struct *task;
@@ -1722,7 +1724,7 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
* take while holding tasklist_lock. Forks can happen - the
* mpol_dup() cpuset_being_rebound check will catch such forks,
* and rebind their vma mempolicies too. Because we still hold
- * the global cpuset_mutex, we know that no other rebind effort
+ * the global cpuset_rwsem, we know that no other rebind effort
* will be contending for the global variable cpuset_being_rebound.
* It's ok if we rebind the same mm twice; mpol_rebind_mm()
* is idempotent. Also migrate pages in each mm to new nodes.
@@ -1768,7 +1770,7 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
*
* On legacy hierarchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
*
- * Called with cpuset_mutex held
+ * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
*/
static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
{
@@ -1821,7 +1823,7 @@ static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
* mempolicies and if the cpuset is marked 'memory_migrate',
* migrate the tasks pages to the new memory.
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held. May take callback_lock during call.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held. May take callback_lock during call.
* Will take tasklist_lock, scan tasklist for tasks in cpuset cs,
* lock each such tasks mm->mmap_lock, scan its vma's and rebind
* their mempolicies to the cpusets new mems_allowed.
@@ -1911,7 +1913,7 @@ static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val)
* @cs: the cpuset in which each task's spread flags needs to be changed
*
* Iterate through each task of @cs updating its spread flags. As this
- * function is called with cpuset_mutex held, cpuset membership stays
+ * function is called with cpuset_rwsem held, cpuset membership stays
* stable.
*/
static void update_tasks_flags(struct cpuset *cs)
@@ -1931,7 +1933,7 @@ static void update_tasks_flags(struct cpuset *cs)
* cs: the cpuset to update
* turning_on: whether the flag is being set or cleared
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t bit, struct cpuset *cs,
@@ -1980,7 +1982,7 @@ static int update_flag(cpuset_flagbits_t bit, struct cpuset *cs,
* cs: the cpuset to update
* new_prs: new partition root state
*
- * Call with cpuset_mutex held.
+ * Call with cpuset_rwsem held.
*/
static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
{
@@ -2167,7 +2169,7 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
static struct cpuset *cpuset_attach_old_cs;
-/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_mutex held */
+/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_rwsem held */
static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
@@ -2219,7 +2221,7 @@ static void cpuset_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
}
/*
- * Protected by cpuset_mutex. cpus_attach is used only by cpuset_attach()
+ * Protected by cpuset_rwsem. cpus_attach is used only by cpuset_attach()
* but we can't allocate it dynamically there. Define it global and
* allocate from cpuset_init().
*/
@@ -2227,7 +2229,7 @@ static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;
static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
- /* static buf protected by cpuset_mutex */
+ /* static buf protected by cpuset_rwsem */
static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_to;
struct task_struct *task;
struct task_struct *leader;
@@ -2417,7 +2419,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
* operation like this one can lead to a deadlock through kernfs
* active_ref protection. Let's break the protection. Losing the
* protection is okay as we check whether @cs is online after
- * grabbing cpuset_mutex anyway. This only happens on the legacy
+ * grabbing cpuset_rwsem anyway. This only happens on the legacy
* hierarchies.
*/
css_get(&cs->css);
@@ -3672,7 +3674,7 @@ void __cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void)
* - Used for /proc/<pid>/cpuset.
* - No need to task_lock(tsk) on this tsk->cpuset reference, as it
* doesn't really matter if tsk->cpuset changes after we read it,
- * and we take cpuset_mutex, keeping cpuset_attach() from changing it
+ * and we take cpuset_rwsem, keeping cpuset_attach() from changing it
* anyway.
*/
int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
--
2.18.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 2:42 [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Fix incorrect warning from cgroup_apply_control_disable() Waiman Long
2021-09-10 2:42 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <20210910024256.7615-1-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2021-09-10 2:42 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-09-10 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Change references of cpuset_mutex to cpuset_rwsem Waiman Long
2021-09-13 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-13 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Fix incorrect warning from cgroup_apply_control_disable() Tejun Heo
2021-09-13 18:05 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <YT+TA6ItnF9xM3cR-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2021-09-13 18:35 ` Waiman Long
2021-09-13 18:35 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <125c4202-68d1-1a4e-03d6-2b18f0794ba4-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2021-09-13 18:40 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-13 18:40 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-13 18:43 ` Waiman Long
2021-09-13 18:43 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <dbb1a221-b3d2-5086-e47b-8a2c764d60ad-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2021-09-13 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-13 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <YT+cPPyDPimHibSC-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2021-09-13 18:46 ` Waiman Long
2021-09-13 18:46 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910024256.7615-2-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=juri.lelli-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.