From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:09:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202109161407.R1XHBhST-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915033753.1201597-2-houtao1@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6243 bytes --]
Hi Hou,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on bpf/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.15-rc1 next-20210915]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hou-Tao/introduce-dummy-BPF-STRUCT_OPS/20210915-112614
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-r004-20210916 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8cbbd7e0b2aa21ce7e416cfb63d9965518948c35)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3eeddb24d6b805983fd6147abf5bcaa65091ab2b
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Hou-Tao/introduce-dummy-BPF-STRUCT_OPS/20210915-112614
git checkout 3eeddb24d6b805983fd6147abf5bcaa65091ab2b
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:10:
>> include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:23:24: error: unexpected character <U+FF1B>
struct bpf_dummy_ops {};
^~
>> include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:24:15: error: cannot combine with previous 'struct' declaration specifier
static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:17:23: error: redefinition of 'bpf_get_dummy_ops'
struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void)
^
include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:24:37: note: previous definition is here
static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:23:43: error: no member named 'owner' in 'struct bpf_dummy_ops'
if (ops && !bpf_try_module_get(ops, ops->owner))
~~~ ^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:31:6: error: redefinition of 'bpf_put_dummy_ops'
void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops)
^
include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:25:20: note: previous definition is here
static inline void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops) {}
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:33:27: error: no member named 'owner' in 'struct bpf_dummy_ops'
bpf_module_put(ops, ops->owner);
~~~ ^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:7: error: offsetof of incomplete type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^ ~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:17:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __compiler_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
^ ~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:140:35: note: expanded from macro '__compiler_offsetof'
#define __compiler_offsetof(a, b) __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
^ ~
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:98:9: error: offsetof of incomplete type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
end = offsetofend(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val);
^ ~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:37:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER))
^ ~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:17:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __compiler_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
^ ~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:140:35: note: expanded from macro '__compiler_offsetof'
#define __compiler_offsetof(a, b) __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
^ ~
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:98:9: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
end = offsetofend(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:37:28: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:28:55: note: expanded from macro 'sizeof_field'
#define sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER) sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER))
~~~~~~~~~~~^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
9 errors generated.
vim +23 include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h
19
20 extern struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void);
21 extern void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops);
22 #else
> 23 struct bpf_dummy_ops {};
> 24 static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
25 static inline void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops) {}
26 #endif
27
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 49045 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:09:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202109161407.R1XHBhST-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915033753.1201597-2-houtao1@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6357 bytes --]
Hi Hou,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on bpf/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.15-rc1 next-20210915]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hou-Tao/introduce-dummy-BPF-STRUCT_OPS/20210915-112614
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-r004-20210916 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8cbbd7e0b2aa21ce7e416cfb63d9965518948c35)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3eeddb24d6b805983fd6147abf5bcaa65091ab2b
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Hou-Tao/introduce-dummy-BPF-STRUCT_OPS/20210915-112614
git checkout 3eeddb24d6b805983fd6147abf5bcaa65091ab2b
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:10:
>> include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:23:24: error: unexpected character <U+FF1B>
struct bpf_dummy_ops {};
^~
>> include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:24:15: error: cannot combine with previous 'struct' declaration specifier
static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:17:23: error: redefinition of 'bpf_get_dummy_ops'
struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void)
^
include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:24:37: note: previous definition is here
static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:23:43: error: no member named 'owner' in 'struct bpf_dummy_ops'
if (ops && !bpf_try_module_get(ops, ops->owner))
~~~ ^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:31:6: error: redefinition of 'bpf_put_dummy_ops'
void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops)
^
include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h:25:20: note: previous definition is here
static inline void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops) {}
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:33:27: error: no member named 'owner' in 'struct bpf_dummy_ops'
bpf_module_put(ops, ops->owner);
~~~ ^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:7: error: offsetof of incomplete type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^ ~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:17:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __compiler_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
^ ~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:140:35: note: expanded from macro '__compiler_offsetof'
#define __compiler_offsetof(a, b) __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
^ ~
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:98:9: error: offsetof of incomplete type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
end = offsetofend(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val);
^ ~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:37:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER))
^ ~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:17:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __compiler_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
^ ~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:140:35: note: expanded from macro '__compiler_offsetof'
#define __compiler_offsetof(a, b) __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
^ ~
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:98:9: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
end = offsetofend(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:37:28: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/stddef.h:28:55: note: expanded from macro 'sizeof_field'
#define sizeof_field(TYPE, MEMBER) sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER))
~~~~~~~~~~~^
kernel/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:97:23: note: forward declaration of 'struct bpf_dummy_ops_state'
case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state, val):
^
9 errors generated.
vim +23 include/linux/bpf_dummy_ops.h
19
20 extern struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void);
21 extern void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops);
22 #else
> 23 struct bpf_dummy_ops {};
> 24 static inline struct bpf_dummy_ops *bpf_get_dummy_ops(void) { return NULL; }
25 static inline void bpf_put_dummy_ops(struct bpf_dummy_ops *ops) {}
26 #endif
27
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 49045 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-16 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 3:37 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/3] introduce dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS Hou Tao
2021-09-15 3:37 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose Hou Tao
2021-09-15 20:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-09-18 2:03 ` Hou Tao
2021-09-16 3:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-16 7:09 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-09-16 7:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-15 3:37 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: call dummy struct_ops in bpf_testmode Hou Tao
2021-09-15 3:37 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for BPF STRUCT_OPS Hou Tao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202109161407.R1XHBhST-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.