From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] 56498cfb04: netperf.Throughput_tps -5.4% regression
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:31:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922143137.GT4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922134247.GY3959@techsingularity.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 385 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 02:42:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> For the LKP test, the nr_threads are 50% so I expect with two sockets,
> the machine is fully loaded and would be vulnerable to load-balancing
> artifacts as client and server threads move around. Hence, I ended up
> thinking that this result was likely a false positive.
Fair enough, lets ignore it for now then :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, aubrey.li@linux.intel.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] 56498cfb04: netperf.Throughput_tps -5.4% regression
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:31:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922143137.GT4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922134247.GY3959@techsingularity.net>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 02:42:47PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> For the LKP test, the nr_threads are 50% so I expect with two sockets,
> the machine is fully loaded and would be vulnerable to load-balancing
> artifacts as client and server threads move around. Hence, I ended up
> thinking that this result was likely a false positive.
Fair enough, lets ignore it for now then :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-12 15:34 [sched/fair] 56498cfb04: netperf.Throughput_tps -5.4% regression kernel test robot
2021-09-12 15:34 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-22 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2021-09-22 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2021-09-22 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-22 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-18 15:03 kernel test robot
2021-08-18 15:03 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210922143137.GT4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.