From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [regression] mhi: ath11k resume fails on some devices
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:30:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210924100034.GC19050@workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZdPi8P7YZPhPir+WfS3cY_a7He1m2Pq2uqBhczPdEeoNRb0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:43:55AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 10:36, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Kalle,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 10:00, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Loic and Mani,
> > >>
> > >> I hate to be the bearer of bad news again :)
> > >>
> > >> I noticed already a while ago that commit 020d3b26c07a ("bus: mhi: Early
> > >> MHI resume failure in non M3 state"), introduced in v5.13-rc1, broke
> > >> ath11k resume on my NUC x86 testbox using QCA6390. Interestingly enough
> > >> Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop (with QCA6390 as well) does not have this
> > >> problem, I only see the problem on the NUC. I do not know what's causing
> > >> this difference.
> > >
> > > I suppose the NUC is current PCI-Express power during suspend while
> > > the laptop maintains PCIe/M2 power.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not able to parse that sentence. Can you elaborate more?
>
> Ouch, yes, I wanted to say that the NUC does not maintain the power of
> PCI express during suspend (leading to PCI D3cold state), whereas the
> laptop maintains the power of the M2 card... well, not sure now I see
> your logs.
>
> >
> > >> At the moment I'm running my tests with commit 020d3b26c07a reverted and
> > >> everything works without problems. Is there a simple way to fix this? Or
> > >> maybe we should just revert the commit? Commit log and kernel logs from
> > >> a failing case below.
> > >
> > > Do you have log of success case?
> >
> > A log from a successful case in the end of email, using v5.15-rc1 plus
> > revert of commit 020d3b26c07abe27.
> >
> > > To me, the device loses power, that is why MHI resuming is failing.
> > > Normally the device should be properly recovered/reinitialized. Before
> > > that patch the power loss was simply not detected (or handled at
> > > higher stack level).
> >
> > Currently in ath11k we always keep the firmware running when in suspend,
> > this is a workaround due to problems between mac80211 and MHI stack.
> > IIRC the problem was something related MHI creating struct device during
> > resume or something like that.
>
> Could you give a try with the attached patch? It should solve your
> issue without breaking modem support.
>
It will... But we should first try to see what is causing the device to
be in MHI RESET state. We can't add a force resume case without knowing
the rootcause.
And for workaround, we can proceed resume if device is in RESET state
adding a comment on why. But let's first get the MHI debug logs.
> Regards,
> Loic
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [regression] mhi: ath11k resume fails on some devices
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:30:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210924100034.GC19050@workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZdPi8P7YZPhPir+WfS3cY_a7He1m2Pq2uqBhczPdEeoNRb0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:43:55AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 10:36, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Kalle,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 10:00, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Loic and Mani,
> > >>
> > >> I hate to be the bearer of bad news again :)
> > >>
> > >> I noticed already a while ago that commit 020d3b26c07a ("bus: mhi: Early
> > >> MHI resume failure in non M3 state"), introduced in v5.13-rc1, broke
> > >> ath11k resume on my NUC x86 testbox using QCA6390. Interestingly enough
> > >> Dell XPS 13 9310 laptop (with QCA6390 as well) does not have this
> > >> problem, I only see the problem on the NUC. I do not know what's causing
> > >> this difference.
> > >
> > > I suppose the NUC is current PCI-Express power during suspend while
> > > the laptop maintains PCIe/M2 power.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not able to parse that sentence. Can you elaborate more?
>
> Ouch, yes, I wanted to say that the NUC does not maintain the power of
> PCI express during suspend (leading to PCI D3cold state), whereas the
> laptop maintains the power of the M2 card... well, not sure now I see
> your logs.
>
> >
> > >> At the moment I'm running my tests with commit 020d3b26c07a reverted and
> > >> everything works without problems. Is there a simple way to fix this? Or
> > >> maybe we should just revert the commit? Commit log and kernel logs from
> > >> a failing case below.
> > >
> > > Do you have log of success case?
> >
> > A log from a successful case in the end of email, using v5.15-rc1 plus
> > revert of commit 020d3b26c07abe27.
> >
> > > To me, the device loses power, that is why MHI resuming is failing.
> > > Normally the device should be properly recovered/reinitialized. Before
> > > that patch the power loss was simply not detected (or handled at
> > > higher stack level).
> >
> > Currently in ath11k we always keep the firmware running when in suspend,
> > this is a workaround due to problems between mac80211 and MHI stack.
> > IIRC the problem was something related MHI creating struct device during
> > resume or something like that.
>
> Could you give a try with the attached patch? It should solve your
> issue without breaking modem support.
>
It will... But we should first try to see what is causing the device to
be in MHI RESET state. We can't add a force resume case without knowing
the rootcause.
And for workaround, we can proceed resume if device is in RESET state
adding a comment on why. But let's first get the MHI debug logs.
> Regards,
> Loic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-24 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 8:00 [regression] mhi: ath11k resume fails on some devices Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 8:00 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:18 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-16 10:18 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-16 11:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-16 11:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
[not found] ` <CAMZdPi94607mZorp+Zmkw3seWXak6p9Jr05CQ5hhfgKQoG8n7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2021-09-16 16:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-16 16:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-16 16:42 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 16:42 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 17:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-16 17:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-23 8:34 ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23 8:34 ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23 8:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-23 8:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-23 9:26 ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23 9:26 ` Carl Huang
2021-09-23 10:50 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-23 10:50 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-24 9:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24 9:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24 9:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-24 9:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-07 9:55 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-07 9:55 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-21 10:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-21 10:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-09-24 8:36 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24 8:36 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-24 9:43 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-24 9:43 ` Loic Poulain
2021-09-24 10:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-09-24 10:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-07 9:48 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-07 9:48 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-19 12:12 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-19 12:12 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-21 10:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-10-21 10:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-11-12 11:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-12 11:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-18 17:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-11-18 17:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-01 7:34 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-01 7:34 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-09-25 17:40 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210924100034.GC19050@workstation \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.