All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:41:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929004116.20650-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)

From: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>

To validate and set link latency capability, `struct aspm_latency` and
related members defined within `struct pcie_link_state` are used.
However, since there are not many access to theses values, it is
possible to directly access and compute these values.

Doing this will also reduce the dependency on `struct pcie_link_state`.

The series removes `struct aspm_latency` and related members within
`struct pcie_link_state`. All latencies are now calculated when needed.



VERSION CHANGES:
- v2:
	- directly access downstream by calling `pci_function_0()`
	  instead of using the `struct pcie_link_state`
- v3(this version):
	- rebase on Linux 5.15-rc2

MERGE NOTICE:
These series are based on 
	'commit e4e737bb5c17 ("Linux 5.15-rc2")'


Saheed O. Bolarinwa (3):
  PCI/ASPM: Remove link latencies cached within struct pcie_link_state
  PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.acceptable
  PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency

 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  0:41 Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2021-09-29  0:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] PCI/ASPM: Do not cache link latencies Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-30 23:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29  0:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.acceptable Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-29  0:41 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210929004116.20650-1-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.