All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:11:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211018211158.3050779-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018211158.3050779-1-maz@kernel.org>

Restructure kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() to set the has_run_once
flag after having completed all the "run once" activities.

This includes moving the flip of the userspace irqchip static key
to a point where nothing can fail.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..42efca9853fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -599,8 +599,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
-
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))) {
@@ -611,12 +609,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
-		 * VMs in the wild.
-		 */
-		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 	}
 
 	ret = kvm_timer_enable(vcpu);
@@ -624,6 +616,18 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
+		/*
+		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
+		 * VMs in the wild.
+		 */
+		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
+	}
+
+	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:11:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211018211158.3050779-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018211158.3050779-1-maz@kernel.org>

Restructure kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() to set the has_run_once
flag after having completed all the "run once" activities.

This includes moving the flip of the userspace irqchip static key
to a point where nothing can fail.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..42efca9853fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -599,8 +599,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
-
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))) {
@@ -611,12 +609,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
-		 * VMs in the wild.
-		 */
-		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 	}
 
 	ret = kvm_timer_enable(vcpu);
@@ -624,6 +616,18 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
+		/*
+		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
+		 * VMs in the wild.
+		 */
+		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
+	}
+
+	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:11:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211018211158.3050779-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018211158.3050779-1-maz@kernel.org>

Restructure kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() to set the has_run_once
flag after having completed all the "run once" activities.

This includes moving the flip of the userspace irqchip static key
to a point where nothing can fail.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..42efca9853fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -599,8 +599,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
-
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))) {
@@ -611,12 +609,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
-		 * VMs in the wild.
-		 */
-		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 	}
 
 	ret = kvm_timer_enable(vcpu);
@@ -624,6 +616,18 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(vcpu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
+		/*
+		 * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
+		 * VMs in the wild.
+		 */
+		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
+	}
+
+	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-18 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-18 21:11   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211018211158.3050779-4-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.