From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mtd: core: protect access to mtd devices while in suspend
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020085250.030ef244@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019180800.3v7emokse6lkpjvk@skn-laptop>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:08:00 +0200
Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:22:06AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote on Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:05:46 +0200:
> >
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:52:50 +0200
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >
> > > > One (small) issue still present. gpmi_nand.c uses the rwsem before it's
> > > > initialized. Seems cumbersome to have every mtd/nand driver to call
> > > > init_waitqueue_head() and init_rwsem(). Could we somehow move the call
> > > > to mtd_set_dev_defaults() before nand_create_bbt()?
> > >
> > > I have a nasty trick for that one, but I'm not sure Miquel will like it
> > > (actually, I don't like it either, but it's so simple compared to the
> > > other options we have that I'm tempted to go for this approach until
> > > someone has time to invest in a cleaner solution :-)):
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > index 3d6c6e880520..a9ac2d528a4d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > @@ -6222,8 +6222,6 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > mtd->_sync = nand_sync;
> > > mtd->_lock = nand_lock;
> > > mtd->_unlock = nand_unlock;
> > > - mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
> > > - mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
> > > mtd->_reboot = nand_shutdown;
> > > mtd->_block_isreserved = nand_block_isreserved;
> > > mtd->_block_isbad = nand_block_isbad;
> > > @@ -6269,6 +6267,13 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err_free_secure_regions;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Populate the suspend/resume hooks after the BBT has been scanned to
> > > + * avoid using the suspend lock and resume waitqueue which are only
> > > + * initialized when mtd_device_register() is called.
> > > + */
> > > + mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
> > > + mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
> > > return 0;
> >
> > I'm fine with this as long as it is documented for now.
> >
>
> Hi Boris and Miquel,
>
> gpmi-nand.c sets NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN so we won't get there and populate
> suspend resume hooks :(
> Guess there is other drivers that does the same thing...
This should fix the issue:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 3d6c6e880520..c92b17f66994 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -6222,8 +6222,6 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
mtd->_sync = nand_sync;
mtd->_lock = nand_lock;
mtd->_unlock = nand_unlock;
- mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
- mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
mtd->_reboot = nand_shutdown;
mtd->_block_isreserved = nand_block_isreserved;
mtd->_block_isbad = nand_block_isbad;
@@ -6262,13 +6260,21 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
/* Check, if we should skip the bad block table scan */
if (chip->options & NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN)
- return 0;
+ goto out;
/* Build bad block table */
ret = nand_create_bbt(chip);
if (ret)
goto err_free_secure_regions;
+out:
+ /*
+ * Populate the suspend/resume hooks after the BBT has been scanned to
+ * avoid using the suspend lock and resume waitqueue which are only
+ * initialized when mtd_device_register() is called.
+ */
+ mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
+ mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
return 0;
err_free_secure_regions:
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mtd: core: protect access to mtd devices while in suspend
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020085250.030ef244@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019180800.3v7emokse6lkpjvk@skn-laptop>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:08:00 +0200
Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:22:06AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote on Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:05:46 +0200:
> >
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:52:50 +0200
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >
> > > > One (small) issue still present. gpmi_nand.c uses the rwsem before it's
> > > > initialized. Seems cumbersome to have every mtd/nand driver to call
> > > > init_waitqueue_head() and init_rwsem(). Could we somehow move the call
> > > > to mtd_set_dev_defaults() before nand_create_bbt()?
> > >
> > > I have a nasty trick for that one, but I'm not sure Miquel will like it
> > > (actually, I don't like it either, but it's so simple compared to the
> > > other options we have that I'm tempted to go for this approach until
> > > someone has time to invest in a cleaner solution :-)):
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > index 3d6c6e880520..a9ac2d528a4d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > > @@ -6222,8 +6222,6 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > mtd->_sync = nand_sync;
> > > mtd->_lock = nand_lock;
> > > mtd->_unlock = nand_unlock;
> > > - mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
> > > - mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
> > > mtd->_reboot = nand_shutdown;
> > > mtd->_block_isreserved = nand_block_isreserved;
> > > mtd->_block_isbad = nand_block_isbad;
> > > @@ -6269,6 +6267,13 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err_free_secure_regions;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Populate the suspend/resume hooks after the BBT has been scanned to
> > > + * avoid using the suspend lock and resume waitqueue which are only
> > > + * initialized when mtd_device_register() is called.
> > > + */
> > > + mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
> > > + mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
> > > return 0;
> >
> > I'm fine with this as long as it is documented for now.
> >
>
> Hi Boris and Miquel,
>
> gpmi-nand.c sets NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN so we won't get there and populate
> suspend resume hooks :(
> Guess there is other drivers that does the same thing...
This should fix the issue:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 3d6c6e880520..c92b17f66994 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -6222,8 +6222,6 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
mtd->_sync = nand_sync;
mtd->_lock = nand_lock;
mtd->_unlock = nand_unlock;
- mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
- mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
mtd->_reboot = nand_shutdown;
mtd->_block_isreserved = nand_block_isreserved;
mtd->_block_isbad = nand_block_isbad;
@@ -6262,13 +6260,21 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
/* Check, if we should skip the bad block table scan */
if (chip->options & NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN)
- return 0;
+ goto out;
/* Build bad block table */
ret = nand_create_bbt(chip);
if (ret)
goto err_free_secure_regions;
+out:
+ /*
+ * Populate the suspend/resume hooks after the BBT has been scanned to
+ * avoid using the suspend lock and resume waitqueue which are only
+ * initialized when mtd_device_register() is called.
+ */
+ mtd->_suspend = nand_suspend;
+ mtd->_resume = nand_resume;
return 0;
err_free_secure_regions:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-11 11:52 [PATCH 0/3] mtd: core: protect access to mtd devices while in suspend Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd: core: protect access to MTD " Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 13:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-14 6:50 ` [mtd] d3ff51cfa9: WARNING:at_kernel/locking/rwsem.c:#down_read kernel test robot
2021-10-14 6:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-14 6:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-15 6:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd: core: protect access to MTD devices while in suspend Boris Brezillon
2021-10-15 6:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 11:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] mtd: rawnand: remove suspended check Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd: mtdconcat: add suspend lock handling Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 11:52 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 13:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:35 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 13:35 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-11 13:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 13:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 14:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] mtd: core: protect access to mtd devices while in suspend Boris Brezillon
2021-10-11 14:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-15 6:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-15 6:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-19 18:08 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-19 18:08 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-20 6:52 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2021-10-20 6:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:12 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-20 7:12 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-20 7:23 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-20 7:23 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-20 7:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:12 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-20 7:12 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-10-20 7:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-20 7:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-10-20 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-20 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020085250.030ef244@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sean@geanix.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.