From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021234044.3071069-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:40:37PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The 'many' test ended with an 'assert(count)', presumably meaning to
> ensure that some objects were actually captured. However, 'count' is
> the number of objects created not how many were captured. Plus, there
> is already a 'require(count > 1)' at the start and count is invarient
> so the final assert is basically pointless.
>
> General concensus appears to be that the test should not fail
> irrespective of how many blobs are captured as low memory situations
> could cause the capture to be abbreviated. So just remove the
> pointless assert completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 7e0a8b8ad..53649cdb2 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned int flags)
> }
> igt_info("Captured %lu %"PRId64"-blobs out of a total of %lu\n",
> blobs, size >> 12, count);
> - igt_assert(count);
>
> free(error);
> free(offsets);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021234044.3071069-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:40:37PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The 'many' test ended with an 'assert(count)', presumably meaning to
> ensure that some objects were actually captured. However, 'count' is
> the number of objects created not how many were captured. Plus, there
> is already a 'require(count > 1)' at the start and count is invarient
> so the final assert is basically pointless.
>
> General concensus appears to be that the test should not fail
> irrespective of how many blobs are captured as low memory situations
> could cause the capture to be abbreviated. So just remove the
> pointless assert completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 7e0a8b8ad..53649cdb2 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned int flags)
> }
> igt_info("Captured %lu %"PRId64"-blobs out of a total of %lu\n",
> blobs, size >> 12, count);
> - igt_assert(count);
>
> free(error);
> free(offsets);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 23:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Fixes for gem_exec_capture John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:14 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-10-29 2:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 13:50 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 13:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:44 ` [igt-dev] " John Harrison
2021-11-03 18:44 ` John Harrison
2021-11-04 9:14 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-04 9:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Cope with larger page sizes John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 17:39 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-29 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-30 0:32 ` John Harrison
2021-10-30 0:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-11-02 23:18 ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-02 23:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Make the error decode a common helper John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:34 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-29 2:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Use contexts and engines properly John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-11-02 23:34 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-11-02 23:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 1:45 ` John Harrison
2021-11-03 9:36 ` [igt-dev] " Petri Latvala
2021-11-03 9:36 ` Petri Latvala
2021-11-03 18:49 ` [igt-dev] " John Harrison
2021-11-03 18:49 ` John Harrison
2021-11-04 6:40 ` [igt-dev] " Petri Latvala
2021-11-04 6:40 ` Petri Latvala
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Check for memory allocation failure John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:20 ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 14:00 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 14:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:36 ` [igt-dev] " John Harrison
2021-11-03 18:36 ` John Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] lib/igt_sysfs: Support large files John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:46 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-29 2:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] lib/igt_gt: Allow per engine reset testing John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-11-03 0:47 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 0:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Update to support GuC based resets John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:54 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-22 0:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fixes for gem_exec_capture Patchwork
2021-10-22 3:38 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.