From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:37:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029083751.GR3891@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b884ad7d-48d3-fcc8-d199-9e7643552a9a@bytedance.com>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 02:12:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
> On 10/28/21 11:30 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > That aside though, the configuration space could be better. It's possible
> > to selectively disable NUMA balance but not selectively enable because
> > prctl is disabled if global NUMA balancing is disabled. That could be
> > somewhat achieved by having a default value for mm->numa_balancing based on
> > whether the global numa balancing is disabled via command line or sysctl
> > and enabling the static branch if prctl is used with an informational
> > message. This is not the only potential solution but as it stands,
> > there are odd semantic corner cases. For example, explicit enabling
> > of NUMA balancing by prctl gets silently revoked if numa balancing is
> > disabled via sysctl and prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,
> > 1) means nothing.
> >
> static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int
> queued)
> {
> ...
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_numa_balancing))
> task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
> ...
> }
>
> static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
> {
> ...
> if (!READ_ONCE(curr->mm->numa_balancing))
> return;
> ...
> }
>
> When global numa_balancing is disabled, mm->numa_balancing is useless.
I'm aware that this is the behaviour of the patch as-is.
> So I
> think prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,0/1) should return
> error instead of modify mm->numa_balancing.
>
> Is it reasonable that prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING,PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,0/1)
> can still change the value of mm->numa_balancing when global numa_balancing
> is disabled?
>
My point is that as it stands,
prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING,PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,1) either does nothing or
fails. If per-process numa balancing is to be introduced, it should have
meaning with the global tuning affecting default behaviour and the prctl
affecting specific behaviour.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-27 13:26 [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing Gang Li
2021-10-28 15:30 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-29 6:12 ` Gang Li
2021-10-29 8:37 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-11-09 8:28 ` 李港
2021-11-09 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-09 10:40 ` Gang Li
2021-11-09 12:12 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-09 13:58 ` Gang Li
2021-11-09 16:26 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-17 7:07 ` Gang Li
2021-11-17 8:29 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-17 9:38 ` Gang Li
2021-11-17 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-18 3:26 ` Gang Li
2021-11-18 8:58 ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-18 9:49 ` Gang Li
2021-10-29 7:48 ` [External] " 李港
2021-11-22 7:34 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029083751.GR3891@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.