From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio support cache indirect desc
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:03:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211109080023-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211108114951.92862-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:49:48PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> If the VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC negotiation succeeds, and the number
> of sgs used for sending packets is greater than 1. We must constantly
> call __kmalloc/kfree to allocate/release desc.
>
> In the case of extremely fast package delivery, the overhead cannot be
> ignored:
>
> 27.46% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_add
> 16.66% [kernel] [k] detach_buf_split
> 16.51% [kernel] [k] virtnet_xsk_xmit
> 14.04% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_add_outbuf
> 5.18% [kernel] [k] __kmalloc
> 4.08% [kernel] [k] kfree
> 2.80% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> 2.22% [kernel] [k] xsk_tx_peek_desc
> 2.08% [kernel] [k] memset_erms
> 0.83% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_kick_prepare
> 0.76% [kernel] [k] virtnet_xsk_run
> 0.62% [kernel] [k] __free_old_xmit_ptr
> 0.60% [kernel] [k] vring_map_one_sg
> 0.53% [kernel] [k] native_apic_mem_write
> 0.46% [kernel] [k] sg_next
> 0.43% [kernel] [k] sg_init_table
> 0.41% [kernel] [k] kmalloc_slab
>
> This patch adds a cache function to virtio to cache these allocated indirect
> desc instead of constantly allocating and releasing desc.
>
> v4:
> 1. Only allow desc cache when VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC negotiation is successful
> 2. The desc cache threshold can be set for each virtqueue
>
> v3:
> pre-allocate per buffer indirect descriptors array
So I'm not sure why we are doing that. Did it improve anything?
> v2:
> use struct list_head to cache the desc
>
> Xuan Zhuo (3):
> virtio: cache indirect desc for split
> virtio: cache indirect desc for packed
> virtio-net: enable virtio desc cache
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 ++-
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/virtio.h | 17 ++++
> 3 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.0
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio support cache indirect desc
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:03:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211109080023-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211108114951.92862-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:49:48PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> If the VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC negotiation succeeds, and the number
> of sgs used for sending packets is greater than 1. We must constantly
> call __kmalloc/kfree to allocate/release desc.
>
> In the case of extremely fast package delivery, the overhead cannot be
> ignored:
>
> 27.46% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_add
> 16.66% [kernel] [k] detach_buf_split
> 16.51% [kernel] [k] virtnet_xsk_xmit
> 14.04% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_add_outbuf
> 5.18% [kernel] [k] __kmalloc
> 4.08% [kernel] [k] kfree
> 2.80% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_get_buf_ctx
> 2.22% [kernel] [k] xsk_tx_peek_desc
> 2.08% [kernel] [k] memset_erms
> 0.83% [kernel] [k] virtqueue_kick_prepare
> 0.76% [kernel] [k] virtnet_xsk_run
> 0.62% [kernel] [k] __free_old_xmit_ptr
> 0.60% [kernel] [k] vring_map_one_sg
> 0.53% [kernel] [k] native_apic_mem_write
> 0.46% [kernel] [k] sg_next
> 0.43% [kernel] [k] sg_init_table
> 0.41% [kernel] [k] kmalloc_slab
>
> This patch adds a cache function to virtio to cache these allocated indirect
> desc instead of constantly allocating and releasing desc.
>
> v4:
> 1. Only allow desc cache when VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC negotiation is successful
> 2. The desc cache threshold can be set for each virtqueue
>
> v3:
> pre-allocate per buffer indirect descriptors array
So I'm not sure why we are doing that. Did it improve anything?
> v2:
> use struct list_head to cache the desc
>
> Xuan Zhuo (3):
> virtio: cache indirect desc for split
> virtio: cache indirect desc for packed
> virtio-net: enable virtio desc cache
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 ++-
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/virtio.h | 17 ++++
> 3 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-08 11:49 [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio support cache indirect desc Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] virtio: cache indirect desc for split Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-09 13:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 13:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 15:00 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio: cache indirect desc for packed Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio-net: enable virtio desc cache Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 11:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-08 13:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio support cache indirect desc Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-08 13:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-08 14:47 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-10 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-10 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-10 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-10 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-11 6:52 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-11 15:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-11 15:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-12 1:53 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-09 13:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-11-09 13:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 15:14 ` Xuan Zhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211109080023-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.