All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_vcpu_has_run_once
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 01:22:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211113012234.1443009-3-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211113012234.1443009-1-rananta@google.com>

Architectures such as arm64 and riscv uses vcpu variables
such as has_run_once and ran_atleast_once, respectively,
to mark if the vCPU has started running. Since these are
architecture agnostic variables, introduce
kvm_vcpu_has_run_once() as a core kvm functionality and
use this instead of the architecture defined variables.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c   | 2 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c             | 7 ++-----
 include/linux/kvm_host.h          | 7 +++++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c               | 1 +
 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4be8486042a7..02dffe50a20c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -367,9 +367,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	int target;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
 
-	/* Detect first run of a vcpu */
-	bool has_run_once;
-
 	/* Virtual SError ESR to restore when HCR_EL2.VSE is set */
 	u64 vsesr_el2;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index f5490afe1ebf..0cc148211b4e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu) && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
 		static_branch_dec(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 
 	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
@@ -582,13 +582,13 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+	if (likely(kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 * need to invalidate the I-cache though, as FWB does *not*
 	 * imply CTR_EL0.DIC.
 	 */
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 		if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB))
 			stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
 		else
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 0a06d0648970..6fb41097880b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
 		return ret;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
+		if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu))
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	ret = 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 25ba21f98504..645e95f61d47 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -147,9 +147,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_csr {
 };
 
 struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
-	/* VCPU ran at least once */
-	bool ran_atleast_once;
-
 	/* ISA feature bits (similar to MISA) */
 	unsigned long isa;
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index e3d3aed46184..18cbc8b0c03d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx;
 
-	/* Mark this VCPU never ran */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = false;
-
 	/* Setup ISA features available to VCPU */
 	vcpu->arch.isa = riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL) & KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
 
@@ -190,7 +187,7 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	switch (reg_num) {
 	case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(isa):
-		if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once) {
+		if (!kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 			vcpu->arch.isa = reg_val;
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL);
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
@@ -682,7 +679,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 
 	/* Mark this VCPU ran at least once */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	vcpu->arch.srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 60a35d9fe259..b373929c71eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
 	 * it is a valid slot.
 	 */
 	int last_used_slot;
+
+	bool has_run_once;
 };
 
 /* must be called with irqs disabled */
@@ -1847,4 +1849,9 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
 #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return vcpu->has_run_once;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 3f6d450355f0..1ec8a8e959b2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
 	vcpu->ready = false;
 	preempt_notifier_init(&vcpu->preempt_notifier, &kvm_preempt_ops);
 	vcpu->last_used_slot = 0;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = false;
 }
 
 void kvm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	 Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	 Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_vcpu_has_run_once
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 01:22:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211113012234.1443009-3-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211113012234.1443009-1-rananta@google.com>

Architectures such as arm64 and riscv uses vcpu variables
such as has_run_once and ran_atleast_once, respectively,
to mark if the vCPU has started running. Since these are
architecture agnostic variables, introduce
kvm_vcpu_has_run_once() as a core kvm functionality and
use this instead of the architecture defined variables.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c   | 2 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c             | 7 ++-----
 include/linux/kvm_host.h          | 7 +++++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c               | 1 +
 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4be8486042a7..02dffe50a20c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -367,9 +367,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	int target;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
 
-	/* Detect first run of a vcpu */
-	bool has_run_once;
-
 	/* Virtual SError ESR to restore when HCR_EL2.VSE is set */
 	u64 vsesr_el2;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index f5490afe1ebf..0cc148211b4e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu) && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
 		static_branch_dec(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 
 	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
@@ -582,13 +582,13 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+	if (likely(kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 * need to invalidate the I-cache though, as FWB does *not*
 	 * imply CTR_EL0.DIC.
 	 */
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 		if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB))
 			stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
 		else
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 0a06d0648970..6fb41097880b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
 		return ret;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
+		if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu))
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	ret = 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 25ba21f98504..645e95f61d47 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -147,9 +147,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_csr {
 };
 
 struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
-	/* VCPU ran at least once */
-	bool ran_atleast_once;
-
 	/* ISA feature bits (similar to MISA) */
 	unsigned long isa;
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index e3d3aed46184..18cbc8b0c03d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx;
 
-	/* Mark this VCPU never ran */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = false;
-
 	/* Setup ISA features available to VCPU */
 	vcpu->arch.isa = riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL) & KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
 
@@ -190,7 +187,7 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	switch (reg_num) {
 	case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(isa):
-		if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once) {
+		if (!kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 			vcpu->arch.isa = reg_val;
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL);
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
@@ -682,7 +679,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 
 	/* Mark this VCPU ran at least once */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	vcpu->arch.srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 60a35d9fe259..b373929c71eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
 	 * it is a valid slot.
 	 */
 	int last_used_slot;
+
+	bool has_run_once;
 };
 
 /* must be called with irqs disabled */
@@ -1847,4 +1849,9 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
 #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return vcpu->has_run_once;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 3f6d450355f0..1ec8a8e959b2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
 	vcpu->ready = false;
 	preempt_notifier_init(&vcpu->preempt_notifier, &kvm_preempt_ops);
 	vcpu->last_used_slot = 0;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = false;
 }
 
 void kvm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_vcpu_has_run_once
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 01:22:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211113012234.1443009-3-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211113012234.1443009-1-rananta@google.com>

Architectures such as arm64 and riscv uses vcpu variables
such as has_run_once and ran_atleast_once, respectively,
to mark if the vCPU has started running. Since these are
architecture agnostic variables, introduce
kvm_vcpu_has_run_once() as a core kvm functionality and
use this instead of the architecture defined variables.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c   | 2 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c             | 7 ++-----
 include/linux/kvm_host.h          | 7 +++++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c               | 1 +
 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4be8486042a7..02dffe50a20c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -367,9 +367,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	int target;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
 
-	/* Detect first run of a vcpu */
-	bool has_run_once;
-
 	/* Virtual SError ESR to restore when HCR_EL2.VSE is set */
 	u64 vsesr_el2;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index f5490afe1ebf..0cc148211b4e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu) && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
 		static_branch_dec(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
 
 	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
@@ -582,13 +582,13 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+	if (likely(kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
 
@@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 * need to invalidate the I-cache though, as FWB does *not*
 	 * imply CTR_EL0.DIC.
 	 */
-	if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 		if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB))
 			stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
 		else
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 0a06d0648970..6fb41097880b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
 		return ret;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
+		if (kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu))
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	ret = 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 25ba21f98504..645e95f61d47 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -147,9 +147,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_csr {
 };
 
 struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
-	/* VCPU ran at least once */
-	bool ran_atleast_once;
-
 	/* ISA feature bits (similar to MISA) */
 	unsigned long isa;
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index e3d3aed46184..18cbc8b0c03d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx;
 
-	/* Mark this VCPU never ran */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = false;
-
 	/* Setup ISA features available to VCPU */
 	vcpu->arch.isa = riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL) & KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
 
@@ -190,7 +187,7 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	switch (reg_num) {
 	case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(isa):
-		if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once) {
+		if (!kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
 			vcpu->arch.isa = reg_val;
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL);
 			vcpu->arch.isa &= KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED;
@@ -682,7 +679,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 
 	/* Mark this VCPU ran at least once */
-	vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = true;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = true;
 
 	vcpu->arch.srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 60a35d9fe259..b373929c71eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
 	 * it is a valid slot.
 	 */
 	int last_used_slot;
+
+	bool has_run_once;
 };
 
 /* must be called with irqs disabled */
@@ -1847,4 +1849,9 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
 #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return vcpu->has_run_once;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 3f6d450355f0..1ec8a8e959b2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
 	vcpu->ready = false;
 	preempt_notifier_init(&vcpu->preempt_notifier, &kvm_preempt_ops);
 	vcpu->last_used_slot = 0;
+	vcpu->has_run_once = false;
 }
 
 void kvm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-13  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-13  1:22 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for hypercall services selection Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: Factor out firmware register handling from psci.c Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-27 13:16   ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-27 13:16     ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-27 13:16     ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-30  0:57     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-30  0:57       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-30  0:57       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2021-11-13  1:22   ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_vcpu_has_run_once Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-22 16:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 16:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 16:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 18:31     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:31       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:31       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_vm_has_run_once Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-22 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 16:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 16:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 18:48     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:48       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:48       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: arm64: Setup a framework for hypercall bitmap firmware registers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-22 17:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 17:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 17:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 18:34     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:34       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-23 18:34       ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-27 17:27       ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-27 17:27         ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-27 17:27         ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-30  0:56         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-30  0:56           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-30  0:56           ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-30 10:19           ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-30 10:19             ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-30 10:19             ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: arm64: Add standard hypervisor firmware register Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: arm64: Add vendor " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] Docs: KVM: Add doc for the bitmap firmware registers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] Docs: KVM: Rename psci.rst to hypercalls.rst Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] tools: Import ARM SMCCC definitions Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Introduce hypercall ABI test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add the bitmap firmware registers to get-reg-list Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-11-13  1:22   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211113012234.1443009-3-rananta@google.com \
    --to=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.