From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [ast-bpf:relo_core 9/19] kernel/bpf/btf.c:6417:5: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_types_are_compat'
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:17:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202111150730.fJSGk0XH-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3229 bytes --]
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git relo_core
head: f17ef55e5e0bac0d11d3186cd1c468b5a1e047d7
commit: 03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861 [9/19] bpf: Prepare relo_core.c for kernel duty.
config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git/commit/?id=03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861
git remote add ast-bpf https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git
git fetch --no-tags ast-bpf relo_core
git checkout 03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Note: the ast-bpf/relo_core HEAD f17ef55e5e0bac0d11d3186cd1c468b5a1e047d7 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectability.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function 'btf_seq_show':
kernel/bpf/btf.c:5888:29: error: function 'btf_seq_show' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
5888 | seq_vprintf((struct seq_file *)show->target, fmt, args);
| ^~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function 'btf_snprintf_show':
kernel/bpf/btf.c:5925:9: error: function 'btf_snprintf_show' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
5925 | len = vsnprintf(show->target, ssnprintf->len_left, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/bpf/btf.c: At top level:
>> kernel/bpf/btf.c:6417:5: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_types_are_compat' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
6417 | int bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/btf.c:6431:8: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_essential_name_len' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
6431 | size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +/bpf_core_types_are_compat +6417 kernel/bpf/btf.c
6416
> 6417 int bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
6418 const struct btf *targ_btf, __u32 targ_id)
6419 {
6420 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
6421 }
6422
6423 static bool bpf_core_is_flavor_sep(const char *s)
6424 {
6425 /* check X___Y name pattern, where X and Y are not underscores */
6426 return s[0] != '_' && /* X */
6427 s[1] == '_' && s[2] == '_' && s[3] == '_' && /* ___ */
6428 s[4] != '_'; /* Y */
6429 }
6430
> 6431 size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 61981 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ast-bpf:relo_core 9/19] kernel/bpf/btf.c:6417:5: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_types_are_compat'
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:17:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202111150730.fJSGk0XH-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3164 bytes --]
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git relo_core
head: f17ef55e5e0bac0d11d3186cd1c468b5a1e047d7
commit: 03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861 [9/19] bpf: Prepare relo_core.c for kernel duty.
config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git/commit/?id=03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861
git remote add ast-bpf https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git
git fetch --no-tags ast-bpf relo_core
git checkout 03c354f8c71c2478c421d5552d284e0befb03861
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Note: the ast-bpf/relo_core HEAD f17ef55e5e0bac0d11d3186cd1c468b5a1e047d7 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectability.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function 'btf_seq_show':
kernel/bpf/btf.c:5888:29: error: function 'btf_seq_show' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
5888 | seq_vprintf((struct seq_file *)show->target, fmt, args);
| ^~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function 'btf_snprintf_show':
kernel/bpf/btf.c:5925:9: error: function 'btf_snprintf_show' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
5925 | len = vsnprintf(show->target, ssnprintf->len_left, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/bpf/btf.c: At top level:
>> kernel/bpf/btf.c:6417:5: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_types_are_compat' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
6417 | int bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/btf.c:6431:8: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_essential_name_len' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
6431 | size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +/bpf_core_types_are_compat +6417 kernel/bpf/btf.c
6416
> 6417 int bpf_core_types_are_compat(const struct btf *local_btf, __u32 local_id,
6418 const struct btf *targ_btf, __u32 targ_id)
6419 {
6420 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
6421 }
6422
6423 static bool bpf_core_is_flavor_sep(const char *s)
6424 {
6425 /* check X___Y name pattern, where X and Y are not underscores */
6426 return s[0] != '_' && /* X */
6427 s[1] == '_' && s[2] == '_' && s[3] == '_' && /* ___ */
6428 s[4] != '_'; /* Y */
6429 }
6430
> 6431 size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 61981 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-14 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-14 23:17 kernel test robot [this message]
2021-11-14 23:17 ` [ast-bpf:relo_core 9/19] kernel/bpf/btf.c:6417:5: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_core_types_are_compat' kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202111150730.fJSGk0XH-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.