From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] of/fdt: Rework early FDT scanning functions
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:12:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211118181213.1433346-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
The early FDT scanning functions use of_scan_flat_dt() which implements
its own node walking method. This function predates libfdt and is an
unnecessary indirection. This series reworks
early_init_dt_scan_chosen(), early_init_dt_scan_root(), and
early_init_dt_scan_memory() to be called directly and use libfdt calls.
Ultimately, I want to remove of_scan_flat_dt(). Most of the remaining
of_scan_flat_dt() users are in powerpc.
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_chosen() to call directly
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_root() to call directly
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_memory() to call directly
arch/mips/ralink/of.c | 16 +---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 22 ++---
arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/kaslr_booke.c | 4 +-
drivers/of/fdt.c | 121 ++++++++++++++-------------
include/linux/of_fdt.h | 9 +-
5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] of/fdt: Rework early FDT scanning functions
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:12:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211118181213.1433346-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
The early FDT scanning functions use of_scan_flat_dt() which implements
its own node walking method. This function predates libfdt and is an
unnecessary indirection. This series reworks
early_init_dt_scan_chosen(), early_init_dt_scan_root(), and
early_init_dt_scan_memory() to be called directly and use libfdt calls.
Ultimately, I want to remove of_scan_flat_dt(). Most of the remaining
of_scan_flat_dt() users are in powerpc.
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_chosen() to call directly
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_root() to call directly
of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_memory() to call directly
arch/mips/ralink/of.c | 16 +---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 22 ++---
arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/kaslr_booke.c | 4 +-
drivers/of/fdt.c | 121 ++++++++++++++-------------
include/linux/of_fdt.h | 9 +-
5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-18 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 18:12 Rob Herring [this message]
2021-11-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 0/3] of/fdt: Rework early FDT scanning functions Rob Herring
2021-11-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_chosen() to call directly Rob Herring
2021-11-18 18:12 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-24 16:13 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-24 16:13 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_root() " Rob Herring
2021-11-18 18:12 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-24 16:20 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-24 16:20 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] of/fdt: Rework early_init_dt_scan_memory() " Rob Herring
2021-11-18 18:12 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-24 16:58 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-24 16:58 ` Frank Rowand
2021-11-24 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] of/fdt: Rework early FDT scanning functions Frank Rowand
2021-11-24 17:01 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211118181213.1433346-1-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.