From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
nilal@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64/tracing: add cntvct based trace clock
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119112624.GA51423@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119102117.22304-2-nsaenzju@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Add a new arm64-specific trace clock using the cntvct register, similar
> to x64-tsc. This gives us:
> - A clock that is relatively fast (1GHz on armv8.6, 1-50MHz otherwise),
> monotonic, and resilient to low power modes.
> - It can be used to correlate events across cpus as well as across
> hypervisor and guests.
>
> By using arch_timer_read_counter() we make sure that armv8.6 cpus use
> the less expensive CNTVCTSS_EL0, which cannot be accessed speculatively.
Can this register be read by userspace ? (otherwise it won't be possible
to correlate userspace events).
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maz@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, james.morse@arm.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
mingo@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64/tracing: add cntvct based trace clock
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119112624.GA51423@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119102117.22304-2-nsaenzju@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Add a new arm64-specific trace clock using the cntvct register, similar
> to x64-tsc. This gives us:
> - A clock that is relatively fast (1GHz on armv8.6, 1-50MHz otherwise),
> monotonic, and resilient to low power modes.
> - It can be used to correlate events across cpus as well as across
> hypervisor and guests.
>
> By using arch_timer_read_counter() we make sure that armv8.6 cpus use
> the less expensive CNTVCTSS_EL0, which cannot be accessed speculatively.
Can this register be read by userspace ? (otherwise it won't be possible
to correlate userspace events).
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maz@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, james.morse@arm.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
mingo@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64/tracing: add cntvct based trace clock
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119112624.GA51423@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119102117.22304-2-nsaenzju@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Add a new arm64-specific trace clock using the cntvct register, similar
> to x64-tsc. This gives us:
> - A clock that is relatively fast (1GHz on armv8.6, 1-50MHz otherwise),
> monotonic, and resilient to low power modes.
> - It can be used to correlate events across cpus as well as across
> hypervisor and guests.
>
> By using arch_timer_read_counter() we make sure that armv8.6 cpus use
> the less expensive CNTVCTSS_EL0, which cannot be accessed speculatively.
Can this register be read by userspace ? (otherwise it won't be possible
to correlate userspace events).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-19 10:21 [RFC PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Host/Guest trace syncronization Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64/tracing: add cntvct based trace clock Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 11:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-11-19 11:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 11:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 12:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 13:26 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 13:26 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 13:26 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-22 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-22 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-22 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-24 9:45 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-24 9:45 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-24 9:45 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: export cntvoff in debugfs Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 10:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-19 11:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 11:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 11:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 12:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 12:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-19 13:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 13:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 13:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-22 20:40 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-22 20:40 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-22 20:40 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-11-23 11:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 11:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 11:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-29 12:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-29 12:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-29 12:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211119112624.GA51423@fuller.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.