All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessandro B Maurici <abmaurici@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:58:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123125811.066d0680@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZz2AJ+wqasknw2p@lunn.ch>

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:09:04 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:

> The callback has always had the lock held, so is safe. However,
> recently a few bugs have been reported and fixed for functions like
> phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings() and phy_ethtool_set_link_ksettings()
> where they have accessed phydev members without the lock and got
> inconsistent values in race condition. These are hard race conditions
> to reproduce, but a deadlock like this is very obvious, easy to fix. I
> would also say that _ethtool_ in the function name is also a good hit
> this is intended to be used for an ethtool callback.
> 
> Lets remove the inappropriate use of phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings()
> here.
> 
>      Andrew

Yes, I was under the impression because the lan743x driver used that way, 
this was an expected use case, and that why the patch, but you are 100% 
correct that the phy_dev information sent to the call back would be 
unprotected if used with that patch. My mistake.

Alessandro

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  2:55 [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23  4:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23  4:49   ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23  8:21     ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 14:11       ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 16:06         ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 20:32           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 22:31             ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 14:09     ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 14:14       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-23 15:58       ` Alessandro B Maurici [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211123125811.066d0680@work \
    --to=abmaurici@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.