From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
buendgen@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:14:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125101412.25596ee2@rhtmp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124132716.GT34414@kunlun.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:27:16 +0100
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:10:10AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> > > Now Michal wants to adapt KEXEC_SIG for ppc too so distros can rely on all
> > > architectures using the same mechanism and thus reduce maintenance cost.
> > > On the way there he even makes some absolutely reasonable improvements
> > > for everybody.
> > >
> > > Why is that so controversial? What is the real problem that should be
> > > discussed here?
> >
> > Nothing is controversial with what Michal wants to do. I've already
> > said, "As for adding KEXEC_SIG appended signature support on PowerPC
> > based on the s390 code, it sounds reasonable."
>
> Ok, I will resend the series with the arch-specific changes first to be
> independent of the core cleanup.
could you please add the kexec@lists.infradead.org to Cc when you
resend the series. As this is kexec related I think it makes sense to
give them a heads up, too.
Thanks
Philipp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
buendgen@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:14:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125101412.25596ee2@rhtmp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124132716.GT34414@kunlun.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:27:16 +0100
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:10:10AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> > > Now Michal wants to adapt KEXEC_SIG for ppc too so distros can rely on all
> > > architectures using the same mechanism and thus reduce maintenance cost.
> > > On the way there he even makes some absolutely reasonable improvements
> > > for everybody.
> > >
> > > Why is that so controversial? What is the real problem that should be
> > > discussed here?
> >
> > Nothing is controversial with what Michal wants to do. I've already
> > said, "As for adding KEXEC_SIG appended signature support on PowerPC
> > based on the s390 code, it sounds reasonable."
>
> Ok, I will resend the series with the arch-specific changes first to be
> independent of the core cleanup.
could you please add the kexec@lists.infradead.org to Cc when you
resend the series. As this is kexec related I think it makes sense to
give them a heads up, too.
Thanks
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: strip the signature marker in the verification function Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] Additional appended signature cleanup Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: Use key_being_used_for for log messages in verify_appended_signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 10:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Daniel Axtens
2021-11-05 10:55 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-11-05 13:14 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-05 13:14 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-07 22:18 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-11-07 22:18 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-11-08 12:05 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-08 12:05 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-11 22:26 ` Nayna
2021-11-11 22:26 ` Nayna
2021-11-12 8:30 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-12 8:30 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-15 23:53 ` Nayna
2021-11-15 23:53 ` Nayna
2021-11-16 9:53 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-16 9:53 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-18 22:34 ` Nayna
2021-11-18 22:34 ` Nayna
2021-11-19 11:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-19 11:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-19 18:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-19 18:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 11:09 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-24 11:09 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-24 13:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 13:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 13:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-24 13:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-25 9:14 ` Philipp Rudo [this message]
2021-11-25 9:14 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-11 22:23 ` Nayna
2021-11-11 22:23 ` Nayna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211125101412.25596ee2@rhtmp \
--to=prudo@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=fllinden@amazon.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.