[meta-rockchip] dunfell: u-boot build issue when added patch to u-boot

[meta-rockchip] dunfell: u-boot build issue when added patch to u-boot

[Belisko Marek]

Hello,

I'm trying to integrate mender for tinker-board-s using meta-rockchip
dunfell branch. When added meta-mender which add few patches to
u-boot I'm seeing u-boot compilation issues like:

Error: SPL image is too large (size 0x11000 than 0x8000)
| Error: Bad parameters for image type

Error is clear to me but patches which mender adds are related mostly
to the environment so I'm not sure how SPL can increase size. Any
ideas on how to resolve this issue?

Thanks and regards,

marek


--
as simple and primitive as possible
-------------------------------------------------
Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
Freelance Developer

Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
Tel: +421 915 052 184
skype: marekwhite
twitter: #opennandra
web: http://open-nandra.com

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] dunfell: u-boot build issue when added patch to u-boot

[Trevor Woerner]

On Thu 2021-11-11 @ 08:44:48 AM, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to integrate mender for tinker-board-s using meta-rockchip
> dunfell branch. When added meta-mender which add few patches to
> u-boot I'm seeing u-boot compilation issues like:
> 
> Error: SPL image is too large (size 0x11000 than 0x8000)
> | Error: Bad parameters for image type
> 
> Error is clear to me but patches which mender adds are related mostly
> to the environment so I'm not sure how SPL can increase size. Any
> ideas on how to resolve this issue?

Does the following help?
https://github.com/mendersoftware/meta-mender-community/tree/dunfell/meta-mender-rockchip

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] dunfell: u-boot build issue when added patch to u-boot

[Belisko Marek]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:55 PM Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu 2021-11-11 @ 08:44:48 AM, Marek Belisko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to integrate mender for tinker-board-s using meta-rockchip
> > dunfell branch. When added meta-mender which add few patches to
> > u-boot I'm seeing u-boot compilation issues like:
> >
> > Error: SPL image is too large (size 0x11000 than 0x8000)
> > | Error: Bad parameters for image type
> >
> > Error is clear to me but patches which mender adds are related mostly
> > to the environment so I'm not sure how SPL can increase size. Any
> > ideas on how to resolve this issue?
>
> Does the following help?
I'm adding dunfell support for mender :). In this link mender rockchip
integration is for older u-boot not 2020.01
> https://github.com/mendersoftware/meta-mender-community/tree/dunfell/meta-mender-rockchip

BR,

marek

-- 
as simple and primitive as possible
-------------------------------------------------
Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
Freelance Developer

Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
Tel: +421 915 052 184
skype: marekwhite
twitter: #opennandra
web: http://open-nandra.com

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip] dunfell: u-boot build issue when added patch to u-boot

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:24:56PM +0100, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:55 PM Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu 2021-11-11 @ 08:44:48 AM, Marek Belisko wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to integrate mender for tinker-board-s using meta-rockchip
> > > dunfell branch. When added meta-mender which add few patches to
> > > u-boot I'm seeing u-boot compilation issues like:
> > >
> > > Error: SPL image is too large (size 0x11000 than 0x8000)
> > > | Error: Bad parameters for image type
> > >
> > > Error is clear to me but patches which mender adds are related mostly
> > > to the environment so I'm not sure how SPL can increase size. Any
> > > ideas on how to resolve this issue?
> >
> > Does the following help?
> I'm adding dunfell support for mender :). In this link mender rockchip
> integration is for older u-boot not 2020.01
> > https://github.com/mendersoftware/meta-mender-community/tree/dunfell/meta-mender-rockchip

Did some sort of "enable environment support in SPL" option get enabled
in your patches perhaps?

-- 
Tom