* Fwd: conntrack -L does not show the full table [not found] <CA+PiBLyAYMBw-TgdaqVZ_a2agbRcdKnpZjS9OvP02oPAGPb=+Q@mail.gmail.com> @ 2021-12-08 13:47 ` Vitaly Zuevsky 2021-12-09 10:26 ` Florian Westphal 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Vitaly Zuevsky @ 2021-12-08 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netfilter-devel Hi I have many conntrack entries: # conntrack -C 85380 However, I can't see them all: # conntrack -L ... conntrack v1.4.4 (conntrack-tools): 7315 flow entries have been shown. It is not in the man conntrack how to get the rest (85380-7315) entries. Will it be a bug? Thank you. Vitaly Zuevsky ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: conntrack -L does not show the full table 2021-12-08 13:47 ` Fwd: conntrack -L does not show the full table Vitaly Zuevsky @ 2021-12-09 10:26 ` Florian Westphal 2021-12-09 16:05 ` Vitaly Zuevsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Florian Westphal @ 2021-12-09 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vitaly Zuevsky; +Cc: netfilter-devel Vitaly Zuevsky <vzuevsky@ns1.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have many conntrack entries: > # conntrack -C > 85380 > However, I can't see them all: > # conntrack -L > ... > conntrack v1.4.4 (conntrack-tools): 7315 flow entries have been shown. > > It is not in the man conntrack how to get the rest (85380-7315) > entries. Will it be a bug? Maybe. What happens if you do conntrack -C wc -l < /proc/net/nf_conntrack conntrack -C ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: conntrack -L does not show the full table 2021-12-09 10:26 ` Florian Westphal @ 2021-12-09 16:05 ` Vitaly Zuevsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Vitaly Zuevsky @ 2021-12-09 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel > Vitaly Zuevsky <vzuevsky@ns1.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have many conntrack entries: > > # conntrack -C > > 85380 > > However, I can't see them all: > > # conntrack -L > > ... > > conntrack v1.4.4 (conntrack-tools): 7315 flow entries have been shown. > > > > It is not in the man conntrack how to get the rest (85380-7315) > > entries. Will it be a bug? > > Maybe. What happens if you do > > conntrack -C > wc -l < /proc/net/nf_conntrack > conntrack -C > ? File /proc/net/nf_conntrack does not exist. Default in latest kernels is to not expose conntrack table via /proc 5.4.0-67-generic #75~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-09 16:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CA+PiBLyAYMBw-TgdaqVZ_a2agbRcdKnpZjS9OvP02oPAGPb=+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2021-12-08 13:47 ` Fwd: conntrack -L does not show the full table Vitaly Zuevsky
2021-12-09 10:26 ` Florian Westphal
2021-12-09 16:05 ` Vitaly Zuevsky
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.