All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Jaime Liao <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211221105803.1596cf89@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220185840.ox5hs44hej6nhkxo@ti.com>

Hi Pratyush,

p.yadav@ti.com wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:28:42 +0530:

> On 17/12/21 05:16PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Now that spi_mem_default_supports_op() has access to the static
> > controller capabilities (related to memory operations), and now that
> > these capabilities have been filled by the impacted controllers, there
> > is no need for a specific helper checking only DTR operations, so let's
> > just kill spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() and simply use
> > spi_mem_default_supports_op() instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c |  5 +----
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mem.c             | 10 ----------
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c            | 10 +---------
> >  include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h       | 11 -----------
> >  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > index e137b1ec85d4..67d05ee8d6a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > @@ -335,8 +335,6 @@ static int mxic_spi_data_xfer(struct mxic_spi *mxic, const void *txbuf,
> >  static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  				     const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >  {
> > -	bool all_false;
> > -
> >  	if (op->data.buswidth > 8 || op->addr.buswidth > 8 ||
> >  	    op->dummy.buswidth > 8 || op->cmd.buswidth > 8)
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -348,13 +346,7 @@ static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  	if (op->addr.nbytes > 7)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	all_false = !op->cmd.dtr && !op->addr.dtr && !op->dummy.dtr &&
> > -		    !op->data.dtr;
> > -
> > -	if (all_false)
> > -		return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);
> > -	else
> > -		return spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(mem, op);
> > +	return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);  
> 
> Does this controller support mixed DTR modes? If it doesn't then it 
> should reject mixed DTR ops before calling 
> spi_mem_default_supports_op(). Anyway, the current driver doesn't check 
> for it either so this change does not make anything worse at the very 
> least.

The Cadence SPI driver does something like:

all_true = cmd.dtr && addr.dtr ...;
all_false = !cmd.dtr && !addr.dtr ...;
if (!all_true || !all_false)
	return false;

This basically rules out any mixed DTR operation.

I believe Macronix code is inspired from this function, but they
intentionally dropped the all_true check, making the situation boolean:
either there is at least one DTR op, or there is none. So I believe
this was done on purpose and this controller supports mixed DTR ops.

> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Jaime Liao <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211221105803.1596cf89@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220185840.ox5hs44hej6nhkxo@ti.com>

Hi Pratyush,

p.yadav@ti.com wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:28:42 +0530:

> On 17/12/21 05:16PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Now that spi_mem_default_supports_op() has access to the static
> > controller capabilities (related to memory operations), and now that
> > these capabilities have been filled by the impacted controllers, there
> > is no need for a specific helper checking only DTR operations, so let's
> > just kill spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() and simply use
> > spi_mem_default_supports_op() instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c |  5 +----
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mem.c             | 10 ----------
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c            | 10 +---------
> >  include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h       | 11 -----------
> >  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > index e137b1ec85d4..67d05ee8d6a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > @@ -335,8 +335,6 @@ static int mxic_spi_data_xfer(struct mxic_spi *mxic, const void *txbuf,
> >  static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  				     const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >  {
> > -	bool all_false;
> > -
> >  	if (op->data.buswidth > 8 || op->addr.buswidth > 8 ||
> >  	    op->dummy.buswidth > 8 || op->cmd.buswidth > 8)
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -348,13 +346,7 @@ static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  	if (op->addr.nbytes > 7)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	all_false = !op->cmd.dtr && !op->addr.dtr && !op->dummy.dtr &&
> > -		    !op->data.dtr;
> > -
> > -	if (all_false)
> > -		return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);
> > -	else
> > -		return spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(mem, op);
> > +	return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);  
> 
> Does this controller support mixed DTR modes? If it doesn't then it 
> should reject mixed DTR ops before calling 
> spi_mem_default_supports_op(). Anyway, the current driver doesn't check 
> for it either so this change does not make anything worse at the very 
> least.

The Cadence SPI driver does something like:

all_true = cmd.dtr && addr.dtr ...;
all_false = !cmd.dtr && !addr.dtr ...;
if (!all_true || !all_false)
	return false;

This basically rules out any mixed DTR operation.

I believe Macronix code is inspired from this function, but they
intentionally dropped the all_true check, making the situation boolean:
either there is at least one DTR op, or there is none. So I believe
this was done on purpose and this controller supports mixed DTR ops.

> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-21  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 16:16 [PATCH v7 00/14] External ECC engines & Macronix support Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] spi: spi-mem: Fix a DTR related check in spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:39   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 18:39     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:50     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21  9:50       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:15       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:15         ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:43   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 18:43     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:35     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21  9:35       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] spi: spi-mem: Check the controller extra capabilities Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:48   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 18:48     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] spi: cadence: Provide a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:55   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 18:55     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:16     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:16       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:41       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:41         ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 11:19         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 11:19           ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 12:05           ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 12:05             ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-03  8:38             ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-03  8:38               ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-03  9:18               ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-03  9:18                 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] spi: mxic: " Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:58   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 18:58     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:58     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-12-21  9:58       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:10       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:10         ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:25         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:25           ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] spi: spi-mem: Add an ecc_en parameter to the spi_mem_op structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 19:02   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-20 19:02     ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 17:37     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 17:37       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] mtd: spinand: Delay a little bit the dirmap creation Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] mtd: spinand: Create direct mapping descriptors for ECC operations Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] spi: mxic: Fix the transmit path Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] spi: mxic: Create a helper to configure the controller before an operation Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] spi: mxic: Create a helper to ease the start of " Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] spi: mxic: Add support for direct mapping Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] spi: mxic: Add support for pipelined ECC operations Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211221105803.1596cf89@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.