From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] block: introduce rq_list_move
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 02:49:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202112280210.F89j103t-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211227164138.2488066-2-kbusch@kernel.org>
Hi Keith,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linux-review/Xie-Yongji/nbd-Don-t-use-workqueue-to-handle-recv-work/20211227-171406 linus/master v5.16-rc7 next-20211224]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Keith-Busch/block-introduce-rq_list_for_each_safe-macro/20211228-004304
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: um-i386_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211228/202112280210.F89j103t-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/81098ed2c64adf477eae9c21a4188916e0ef5918
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Keith-Busch/block-introduce-rq_list_for_each_safe-macro/20211228-004304
git checkout 81098ed2c64adf477eae9c21a4188916e0ef5918
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c:27:
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h:227:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
227 | static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
| ^~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/blktrace_api.h:5,
from block/bfq-iosched.h:9,
from block/bfq-cgroup.c:16:
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h:227:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
227 | static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
| ^~~~~~
block/bfq-cgroup.c:1437:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'bfqg_and_blkg_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1437 | void bfqg_and_blkg_get(struct bfq_group *bfqg) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/inline +227 include/linux/blk-mq.h
215
216 #define rq_dma_dir(rq) \
217 (op_is_write(req_op(rq)) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
218
219 /**
220 * rq_list_move() - move a struct request from one list to another
221 * @src: The source list @rq is currently in
222 * @dst: The destination list that @rq will be appended to
223 * @rq: The request to move
224 * @prv: The request preceding @rq in @src (NULL if @rq is the head)
225 * @nxt: The request following @rq in @src (NULL if @rq is the tail)
226 */
> 227 static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
228 struct request *rq, struct request *prv,
229 struct request *nxt)
230 {
231 if (prv)
232 prv->rq_next = nxt;
233 else
234 *src = nxt;
235 rq_list_add(dst, rq);
236 }
237
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] block: introduce rq_list_move
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 02:49:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202112280210.F89j103t-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211227164138.2488066-2-kbusch@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3379 bytes --]
Hi Keith,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linux-review/Xie-Yongji/nbd-Don-t-use-workqueue-to-handle-recv-work/20211227-171406 linus/master v5.16-rc7 next-20211224]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Keith-Busch/block-introduce-rq_list_for_each_safe-macro/20211228-004304
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: um-i386_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211228/202112280210.F89j103t-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/81098ed2c64adf477eae9c21a4188916e0ef5918
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Keith-Busch/block-introduce-rq_list_for_each_safe-macro/20211228-004304
git checkout 81098ed2c64adf477eae9c21a4188916e0ef5918
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c:27:
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h:227:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
227 | static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
| ^~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/blktrace_api.h:5,
from block/bfq-iosched.h:9,
from block/bfq-cgroup.c:16:
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h:227:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
227 | static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
| ^~~~~~
block/bfq-cgroup.c:1437:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'bfqg_and_blkg_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1437 | void bfqg_and_blkg_get(struct bfq_group *bfqg) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/inline +227 include/linux/blk-mq.h
215
216 #define rq_dma_dir(rq) \
217 (op_is_write(req_op(rq)) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
218
219 /**
220 * rq_list_move() - move a struct request from one list to another
221 * @src: The source list @rq is currently in
222 * @dst: The destination list that @rq will be appended to
223 * @rq: The request to move
224 * @prv: The request preceding @rq in @src (NULL if @rq is the head)
225 * @nxt: The request following @rq in @src (NULL if @rq is the tail)
226 */
> 227 static void inline rq_list_move(struct request **src, struct request **dst,
228 struct request *rq, struct request *prv,
229 struct request *nxt)
230 {
231 if (prv)
232 prv->rq_next = nxt;
233 else
234 *src = nxt;
235 rq_list_add(dst, rq);
236 }
237
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-27 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-27 16:41 [PATCHv2 1/3] block: introduce rq_list_for_each_safe macro Keith Busch
2021-12-27 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] block: introduce rq_list_move Keith Busch
2021-12-27 18:49 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-12-27 18:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-29 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-29 20:59 ` Keith Busch
2021-12-27 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] nvme-pci: fix queue_rqs list splitting Keith Busch
2021-12-29 17:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-29 21:04 ` Keith Busch
2021-12-30 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-04 19:38 ` Keith Busch
2022-01-05 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-29 17:39 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] block: introduce rq_list_for_each_safe macro Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-29 20:57 ` Keith Busch
2021-12-30 14:38 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-12-30 15:30 ` Keith Busch
2022-01-03 15:23 ` Max Gurtovoy
2022-01-03 18:15 ` Keith Busch
2022-01-04 12:15 ` Max Gurtovoy
2022-01-05 17:26 ` Keith Busch
2022-01-06 11:54 ` Max Gurtovoy
2022-01-06 13:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202112280210.F89j103t-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.