From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:52:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220103165212.9303-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103165212.9303-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Copy the following arguments passed to arch_stack_walk() to unwind_state
so that they can be passed to unwind functions via unwind_state rather
than as separate arguments:
- task
- regs
- consume_entry
- cookie
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 12 ++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index fc828c3c5dfd..322817d40a75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ struct stack_info {
* @kr_cur: When KRETPOLINES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
+ *
+ * @task: Pointer to the task structure.
+ *
+ * @regs: Registers, if any.
+ *
+ * @consume_pc Consume PC function pointer.
+ *
+ * @cookie Argument to consume_pc().
*/
struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
@@ -61,6 +69,10 @@ struct unwind_state {
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
struct llist_node *kr_cur;
#endif
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct pt_regs *regs;
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_pc;
+ void *cookie;
};
extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index bd797e3f7789..3ecb8242caa5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,8 +33,17 @@
*/
-static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct pt_regs *regs,
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_pc,
+ void *cookie)
{
+ state->task = task;
+ state->regs = regs;
+ state->consume_pc = consume_pc;
+ state->cookie = cookie;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
@@ -56,11 +65,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
/*
* TODO: document requirements here.
*/
-static inline void unwind_init_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline void unwind_init_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- state->fp = regs->regs[29];
- state->pc = regs->pc;
+ state->fp = state->regs->regs[29];
+ state->pc = state->regs->pc;
}
/*
@@ -80,11 +88,10 @@ static __always_inline void unwind_init_current(struct unwind_state *state)
*
* The caller guarantees that the task is not running.
*/
-static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state,
- struct task_struct *task)
+static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
- state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
+ state->fp = thread_saved_fp(state->task);
+ state->pc = thread_saved_pc(state->task);
}
/*
@@ -94,9 +101,9 @@ static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state,
* records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
* and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
*/
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state)
+static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
+ struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
@@ -170,16 +177,14 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
-static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state,
- bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
+static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state)
{
while (1) {
int ret;
- if (!fn(data, state->pc))
+ if (!state->consume_pc(state->cookie, state->pc))
break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
+ ret = unwind_next(state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
@@ -225,14 +230,14 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
{
struct unwind_state state;
- unwind_init_common(&state);
+ unwind_init_common(&state, task, regs, consume_entry, cookie);
if (regs)
- unwind_init_regs(&state, regs);
+ unwind_init_regs(&state);
else if (task == current)
unwind_init_current(&state);
else
- unwind_init_task(&state, task);
+ unwind_init_task(&state);
- unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(&state);
}
--
2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:52:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220103165212.9303-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103165212.9303-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Copy the following arguments passed to arch_stack_walk() to unwind_state
so that they can be passed to unwind functions via unwind_state rather
than as separate arguments:
- task
- regs
- consume_entry
- cookie
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 12 ++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index fc828c3c5dfd..322817d40a75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ struct stack_info {
* @kr_cur: When KRETPOLINES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
+ *
+ * @task: Pointer to the task structure.
+ *
+ * @regs: Registers, if any.
+ *
+ * @consume_pc Consume PC function pointer.
+ *
+ * @cookie Argument to consume_pc().
*/
struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
@@ -61,6 +69,10 @@ struct unwind_state {
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
struct llist_node *kr_cur;
#endif
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct pt_regs *regs;
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_pc;
+ void *cookie;
};
extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index bd797e3f7789..3ecb8242caa5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,8 +33,17 @@
*/
-static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct pt_regs *regs,
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_pc,
+ void *cookie)
{
+ state->task = task;
+ state->regs = regs;
+ state->consume_pc = consume_pc;
+ state->cookie = cookie;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
@@ -56,11 +65,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
/*
* TODO: document requirements here.
*/
-static inline void unwind_init_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline void unwind_init_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- state->fp = regs->regs[29];
- state->pc = regs->pc;
+ state->fp = state->regs->regs[29];
+ state->pc = state->regs->pc;
}
/*
@@ -80,11 +88,10 @@ static __always_inline void unwind_init_current(struct unwind_state *state)
*
* The caller guarantees that the task is not running.
*/
-static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state,
- struct task_struct *task)
+static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
- state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
+ state->fp = thread_saved_fp(state->task);
+ state->pc = thread_saved_pc(state->task);
}
/*
@@ -94,9 +101,9 @@ static inline void unwind_init_task(struct unwind_state *state,
* records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
* and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
*/
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state)
+static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
+ struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
@@ -170,16 +177,14 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
-static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state,
- bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
+static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state)
{
while (1) {
int ret;
- if (!fn(data, state->pc))
+ if (!state->consume_pc(state->cookie, state->pc))
break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
+ ret = unwind_next(state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
@@ -225,14 +230,14 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
{
struct unwind_state state;
- unwind_init_common(&state);
+ unwind_init_common(&state, task, regs, consume_entry, cookie);
if (regs)
- unwind_init_regs(&state, regs);
+ unwind_init_regs(&state);
else if (task == current)
unwind_init_current(&state);
else
- unwind_init_task(&state, task);
+ unwind_init_task(&state);
- unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(&state);
}
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0d0eb36f348fb5a6af6eb592c0525f6e94007328>
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-06 16:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 16:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-06 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-04 14:59 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-04 14:59 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:11 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 16:11 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-06 16:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 16:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:13 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 20:13 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Copy unwind arguments to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-05 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 16:57 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 16:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 16:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-06 20:17 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 20:17 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-05 16:58 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 16:58 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-05 23:58 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-05 23:58 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-06 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-06 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 10/10] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
2022-01-03 16:52 ` madvenka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220103165212.9303-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.