* SIOCGIFCONF and AF_AX25
@ 2022-01-16 16:54 Roland Schwarz
2022-01-17 13:51 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roland Schwarz @ 2022-01-16 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
Using ioctl SIOCGIFCONF one was able to list all interfaces, including
AF_AX25.
This seems to be not be the case any more. I discovered it by trying to
find out why N1UROs axdigi stopped working.
Is this a bug, or is there some other means how the interfaces can be
enumerated?
73 roland, oe1rsa
--
__________________________________________
_ _ | Roland Schwarz
|_)(_ |
| \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz@blackspace.at
________| http://www.blackspace.at
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SIOCGIFCONF and AF_AX25
2022-01-16 16:54 SIOCGIFCONF and AF_AX25 Roland Schwarz
@ 2022-01-17 13:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-17 16:56 ` Roland Schwarz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2022-01-17 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland Schwarz; +Cc: linux-hams
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:54:53PM +0100, Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Using ioctl SIOCGIFCONF one was able to list all interfaces, including
> AF_AX25.
>
> This seems to be not be the case any more. I discovered it by trying to find
> out why N1UROs axdigi stopped working.
>
> Is this a bug, or is there some other means how the interfaces can be
> enumerated?
In the kernel, the rule is "you're not allowed to break userspace".
What that means is that you can change the User facing API so long as
people don't notice and/or complain. Since you are complaining that
means it is a bug.
Can you use git bisect to find out which patch broke this?
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SIOCGIFCONF and AF_AX25
2022-01-17 13:51 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2022-01-17 16:56 ` Roland Schwarz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roland Schwarz @ 2022-01-17 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-hams
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 700 bytes --]
On 17.01.22 at 14:51 wrote Dan Carpenter:
> Can you use git bisect to find out which patch broke this?
Thank you for coming back. It seems however there is no bug. I was
expecting that N1URO's axdigi would work on plain AX25 ports, i.e. such
that have no IP address assigned. It turns out, that as soon as I assign
IP addresses the interfaces are enumerated as expected.
So it is not a kernel bug, and not likely a bug at all, probably only
lacking documentation (or my inability to find it).
73 Roland
--
__________________________________________
_ _ | Roland Schwarz
|_)(_ |
| \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz@blackspace.at
________| http://www.blackspace.at
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-17 16:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-16 16:54 SIOCGIFCONF and AF_AX25 Roland Schwarz
2022-01-17 13:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-17 16:56 ` Roland Schwarz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.