From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"kwankhede@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
"akrowiak@linux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RE]: [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/ccw: Move the lifecycle of the struct vfio_ccw_private to the mdev
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:35:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117153527.GA84788@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9866678ecaafffebbfad8493e192e248b8be8f27.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:30:36AM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 20:28 +0800, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Hope you are back from new year holiday.:-) Have you got chane to
> > consider
> > this patch?
>
> Hi Yi Liu,
>
> It's coming up the list, but it's not there yet. Haven't forgotten. :)
Liu would like to see ccw use a normal lifecycle for the vfio_device
backing memory, is there a shorter path to achieve that then what I
came up with?
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"akrowiak@linux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
"kwankhede@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RE]: [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/ccw: Move the lifecycle of the struct vfio_ccw_private to the mdev
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:35:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117153527.GA84788@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9866678ecaafffebbfad8493e192e248b8be8f27.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:30:36AM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 20:28 +0800, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Hope you are back from new year holiday.:-) Have you got chane to
> > consider
> > this patch?
>
> Hi Yi Liu,
>
> It's coming up the list, but it's not there yet. Haven't forgotten. :)
Liu would like to see ccw use a normal lifecycle for the vfio_device
backing memory, is there a shorter path to achieve that then what I
came up with?
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"kwankhede@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"akrowiak@linux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RE]: [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/ccw: Move the lifecycle of the struct vfio_ccw_private to the mdev
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:35:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117153527.GA84788@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9866678ecaafffebbfad8493e192e248b8be8f27.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:30:36AM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 20:28 +0800, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Hope you are back from new year holiday.:-) Have you got chane to
> > consider
> > this patch?
>
> Hi Yi Liu,
>
> It's coming up the list, but it's not there yet. Haven't forgotten. :)
Liu would like to see ccw use a normal lifecycle for the vfio_device
backing memory, is there a shorter path to achieve that then what I
came up with?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 12:25 [Intel-gfx] [RE]: [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/ccw: Move the lifecycle of the struct vfio_ccw_private to the mdev Liu, Yi L
2021-11-24 12:25 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-11-24 12:25 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-11-29 17:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-11-29 17:18 ` Eric Farman
2021-11-29 17:18 ` Eric Farman
2021-11-30 11:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2021-11-30 11:32 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-11-30 11:32 ` Liu, Yi L
2022-01-14 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu Yi L
2022-01-14 12:28 ` Liu Yi L
2022-01-14 12:28 ` Liu Yi L
2022-01-14 16:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2022-01-14 16:30 ` Eric Farman
2022-01-14 16:30 ` Eric Farman
2022-01-17 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-01-17 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-17 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-18 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2022-01-18 17:33 ` Eric Farman
2022-01-18 17:33 ` Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220117153527.GA84788@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.