All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] security/inode.c: Add capabilities file.
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 22:44:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201222235.SOQYCPHW-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120180116.167702-3-flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>

Hi Francis,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master jmorris-security/next-testing v5.16 next-20220121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Francis-Laniel/Add-capabilities-file-to-sysfs/20220121-020524
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 1d1df41c5a33359a00e919d54eaebfb789711fdc
config: riscv-randconfig-r026-20220120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220122/202201222235.SOQYCPHW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f7b7138a62648f4019c55e4671682af1f851f295)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/48b37f6e79a73709d7bcf17ea19464073f5da9b6
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Francis-Laniel/Add-capabilities-file-to-sysfs/20220121-020524
        git checkout 48b37f6e79a73709d7bcf17ea19464073f5da9b6
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:1024:55: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           return (port > MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT) ? NULL : PCI_IOBASE + port;
                                                     ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> security/inode.c:362:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'securityfs' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,
                                 ^
>> security/inode.c:362:22: warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct dentry *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
           capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,
                               ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   8 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/securityfs +362 security/inode.c

   344	
   345	static int __init securityfs_init(void)
   346	{
   347		int retval;
   348	
   349		retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "security");
   350		if (retval)
   351			return retval;
   352	
   353		retval = register_filesystem(&fs_type);
   354		if (retval) {
   355			sysfs_remove_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "security");
   356			return retval;
   357		}
   358	#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
   359		lsm_dentry = securityfs_create_file("lsm", 0444, NULL, NULL,
   360							&lsm_ops);
   361	#endif
 > 362		capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] security/inode.c: Add capabilities file.
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 22:44:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201222235.SOQYCPHW-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120180116.167702-3-flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7070 bytes --]

Hi Francis,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master jmorris-security/next-testing v5.16 next-20220121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Francis-Laniel/Add-capabilities-file-to-sysfs/20220121-020524
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 1d1df41c5a33359a00e919d54eaebfb789711fdc
config: riscv-randconfig-r026-20220120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220122/202201222235.SOQYCPHW-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f7b7138a62648f4019c55e4671682af1f851f295)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/48b37f6e79a73709d7bcf17ea19464073f5da9b6
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Francis-Laniel/Add-capabilities-file-to-sysfs/20220121-020524
        git checkout 48b37f6e79a73709d7bcf17ea19464073f5da9b6
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                     ^
   In file included from security/inode.c:18:
   In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
   In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:1024:55: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           return (port > MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT) ? NULL : PCI_IOBASE + port;
                                                     ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> security/inode.c:362:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'securityfs' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,
                                 ^
>> security/inode.c:362:22: warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct dentry *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
           capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,
                               ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   8 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/securityfs +362 security/inode.c

   344	
   345	static int __init securityfs_init(void)
   346	{
   347		int retval;
   348	
   349		retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "security");
   350		if (retval)
   351			return retval;
   352	
   353		retval = register_filesystem(&fs_type);
   354		if (retval) {
   355			sysfs_remove_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "security");
   356			return retval;
   357		}
   358	#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
   359		lsm_dentry = securityfs_create_file("lsm", 0444, NULL, NULL,
   360							&lsm_ops);
   361	#endif
 > 362		capabilities_dentry = securityfs("capabilities", 0444, NULL, NULL,

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-20 18:01 [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Add capabilities file to sysfs Francis Laniel
2022-01-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] capability: Add cap_string Francis Laniel
2022-01-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] security/inode.c: Add capabilities file Francis Laniel
2022-01-21  4:01   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-21  8:58   ` Francis Laniel
2022-01-22 14:44   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-01-22 14:44     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-20 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Add capabilities file to sysfs Casey Schaufler
2022-01-20 18:14   ` Francis Laniel
2022-01-20 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-01-20 19:01   ` Francis Laniel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202201222235.SOQYCPHW-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.