All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	Tim Gover <tim.gover@raspberrypi.com>,
	Dom Cobley <dom@raspberrypi.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/10] clk: Always clamp the rounded rate
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220125141549.747889-3-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220125141549.747889-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

The current core while setting the min and max rate properly in the
clk_request structure will not make sure that the requested rate is
within these boundaries, leaving it to each and every driver to make
sure it is.

Add a clamp call to make sure it's always done, and add a few unit tests
to make sure we don't have any regression there.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-test.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.c      |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-test.c b/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
index 47a600d590c1..28c718ab82e1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
@@ -203,6 +203,50 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_invalid(struct kunit *test)
 			0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate
+ * lower than the minimum, the returned rate will be within range.
+ */
+static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	long rate;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+			clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
+			0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate
+ * higher than the maximum, the returned rate will be within range.
+ */
+static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	long rate;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+			clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
+			0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+}
+
 /*
  * Test that if our clock has a rate lower than the minimum set by a
  * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be raised to match the
@@ -266,6 +310,8 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered(struct kunit *test)
 static struct kunit_case clk_range_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_invalid),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered),
 	{}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 8de6a22498e7..7bb5ae0fb688 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1330,6 +1330,8 @@ static int clk_core_determine_round_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
 	if (!core)
 		return 0;
 
+	req->rate = clamp(req->rate, req->min_rate, req->max_rate);
+
 	/*
 	 * At this point, core protection will be disabled
 	 * - if the provider is not protected at all
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Dom Cobley <dom@raspberrypi.com>,
	Tim Gover <tim.gover@raspberrypi.com>,
	Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/10] clk: Always clamp the rounded rate
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220125141549.747889-3-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220125141549.747889-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

The current core while setting the min and max rate properly in the
clk_request structure will not make sure that the requested rate is
within these boundaries, leaving it to each and every driver to make
sure it is.

Add a clamp call to make sure it's always done, and add a few unit tests
to make sure we don't have any regression there.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-test.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.c      |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-test.c b/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
index 47a600d590c1..28c718ab82e1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-test.c
@@ -203,6 +203,50 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_invalid(struct kunit *test)
 			0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate
+ * lower than the minimum, the returned rate will be within range.
+ */
+static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	long rate;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+			clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
+			0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate
+ * higher than the maximum, the returned rate will be within range.
+ */
+static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	long rate;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+			clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
+			0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+}
+
 /*
  * Test that if our clock has a rate lower than the minimum set by a
  * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be raised to match the
@@ -266,6 +310,8 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered(struct kunit *test)
 static struct kunit_case clk_range_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_invalid),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered),
 	{}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 8de6a22498e7..7bb5ae0fb688 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1330,6 +1330,8 @@ static int clk_core_determine_round_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
 	if (!core)
 		return 0;
 
+	req->rate = clamp(req->rate, req->min_rate, req->max_rate);
+
 	/*
 	 * At this point, core protection will be disabled
 	 * - if the provider is not protected at all
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25 14:15 [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Improve clock range handling Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] clk: Introduce Kunit Tests for the framework Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-19  2:20   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-19  2:20     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-21 15:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-21 15:12       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-24 22:30       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-24 22:30         ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-25 14:15 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-01-25 14:15   ` [PATCH v4 02/10] clk: Always clamp the rounded rate Maxime Ripard
2022-02-18 23:15   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-18 23:15     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-21 16:18     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-21 16:18       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-21 16:43       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-21 16:43         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-24 22:39         ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-24 22:39           ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-25  9:35           ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-25  9:35             ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-24 22:32       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-24 22:32         ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-25  9:45         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-25  9:45           ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] clk: Use clamp instead of open-coding our own Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-18 22:34   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-18 22:34     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-21 16:30     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-21 16:30       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-24 22:44       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-24 22:44         ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-25  9:39         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-25  9:39           ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] clk: Always set the rate on clk_set_range_rate Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] clk: Add clk_drop_range Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-19  2:22   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-19  2:22     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] clk: bcm: rpi: Add variant structure Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] clk: bcm: rpi: Set a default minimum rate Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] clk: bcm: rpi: Run some clocks at the minimum rate allowed Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] drm/vc4: Add logging and comments Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] drm/vc4: hdmi: Remove clock rate initialization Maxime Ripard
2022-01-25 14:15   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-10 10:19 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Improve clock range handling Maxime Ripard
2022-02-10 10:19   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-02-19  2:25   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-19  2:25     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-14  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/10] " Laurent Pinchart
2022-02-14  9:45   ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-02-19  2:24   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-19  2:24     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-21  9:56     ` Laurent Pinchart
2022-02-21  9:56       ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220125141549.747889-3-maxime@cerno.tech \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=dom@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.gover@raspberrypi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.