Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add bindings for K3 AM64x SoCs

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

Hello Hari,

On top of Rob's comments about warning, please see below.

On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 10:06:49PM -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> K3 AM64x SoC has a Cortex M4F subsystem in the MCU volatge domain.
> The remote processor's life cycle management and IPC mechanisms are
> similar across the R5F and M4F cores from remote processor driver
> point of view. However, there are subtle differences in image loading
> and starting the M4F subsystems.
> 
> The YAML binding document provides the various node properties to be
> configured by the consumers of the M4F subsystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml  | 121 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 121 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8db9a3f6256e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI K3 M4F processor subsystems
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Some K3 family SoCs have  Arm Cortex M4F cores. AM64x is a SoC in K3
> +  family with a M4F core. Typically safety oriented applications may use
> +  the M4F core in isolation with out an IPC. Where as some Industrial and

s/"with out"/without

s/Industrial/industrial

> +  home automation applications, may use the M4F core as a remote processor
> +  with IPC communications.
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    pattern: "^m4fss(@.*)?"
> +
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - ti,am64-m4fss
> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain a phandle to a PM domain provider node and an args
> +      specifier containing the M4FSS device id value.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#address-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +
> +  "#size-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: Address and Size of the IRAM internal memory region
> +      - description: Address and Size of the DRAM internal memory region
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: iram
> +      - const: dram
> +
> +  resets:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node managing the
> +      local resets for this device, and a reset specifier.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  firmware-name:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain the name of the default firmware image
> +      file located on the firmware search path
> +
> +  mboxes:
> +    description: |
> +      OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
> +      communication with the remote processor. This property should match
> +      with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  memory-region:
> +    description: |
> +      phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the
> +      remoteproc device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes
> +      defined. The reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and
> +      should be defined with a "no-map" property as per the bindings in
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 8
> +#    items:
> +#      - description: region used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and
> +#                         vring buffers
> +#      - description: region reserved for firmware image sections
> +    additionalItems: true
> +
> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - power-domains

There is no "power-domains" in the example below.

> +  - "#address-cells"
> +  - "#size-cells"
> +  - reg
> +  - reg-names
> +  - ti,sci
> +  - ti,sci-dev-id
> +  - ti,sci-proc-ids

The above 3 are not described in this document. 

> +  - resets
> +  - firmware-name
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    cbass_main:  bus@f4000 {
> +      #address-cells = <2>;
> +      #size-cells = <2>;
> +      mcu_m4fss: m4fss@5000000 {
> +        compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss";
> +        reg = <0x00 0x5000000 0x00 0x30000>,
> +              <0x00 0x5040000 0x00 0x10000>;
> +        reg-names = "iram", "dram";
> +        ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
> +        ti,sci-dev-id = <9>;
> +        ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x18 0xff>;
> +        resets = <&k3_reset 9 1>;
> +        firmware-name = "am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw";
> +        mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster6 &mbox_m4_0>;
> +        memory-region = <&mcu_m4fss_dma_memory_region>,
> +                        <&mcu_m4fss_memory_region>;
> +      };
> +    };
> +
> +...
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>