From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220201183612.GC2490199@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124120915.41292-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Hi Angelo,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:09:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Simplify the probe function, where possible, by using dev_err_probe().
> While at it, as to increase human readability, also remove some
> unnecessary forced void pointer casts that were previously used in
> error checking.
I am in favour of all 3 patches (please add a cover letter next time) but weary
about testing - do you have access to a Mediatek platform to try this on or
is it purely theoretical?
I would definitely feel better to see a "Tested-by" tag by someone out there
with access to the HW.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index e40706b0e015..dcddb33e9997 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -757,10 +757,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int ret, i;
>
> rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> - if (!rproc) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + if (!rproc)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>
> scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
> scp->rproc = rproc;
> @@ -770,21 +768,20 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> +
> scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
> scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>
> /* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base);
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> - return ret;
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> }
> } else {
> scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> @@ -792,10 +789,9 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
>
> ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.33.1
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220201183612.GC2490199@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124120915.41292-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Hi Angelo,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:09:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Simplify the probe function, where possible, by using dev_err_probe().
> While at it, as to increase human readability, also remove some
> unnecessary forced void pointer casts that were previously used in
> error checking.
I am in favour of all 3 patches (please add a cover letter next time) but weary
about testing - do you have access to a Mediatek platform to try this on or
is it purely theoretical?
I would definitely feel better to see a "Tested-by" tag by someone out there
with access to the HW.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index e40706b0e015..dcddb33e9997 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -757,10 +757,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int ret, i;
>
> rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> - if (!rproc) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + if (!rproc)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>
> scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
> scp->rproc = rproc;
> @@ -770,21 +768,20 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> +
> scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
> scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>
> /* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base);
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> - return ret;
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> }
> } else {
> scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> @@ -792,10 +789,9 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
>
> ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.33.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220201183612.GC2490199@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124120915.41292-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Hi Angelo,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:09:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Simplify the probe function, where possible, by using dev_err_probe().
> While at it, as to increase human readability, also remove some
> unnecessary forced void pointer casts that were previously used in
> error checking.
I am in favour of all 3 patches (please add a cover letter next time) but weary
about testing - do you have access to a Mediatek platform to try this on or
is it purely theoretical?
I would definitely feel better to see a "Tested-by" tag by someone out there
with access to the HW.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index e40706b0e015..dcddb33e9997 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -757,10 +757,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int ret, i;
>
> rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> - if (!rproc) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + if (!rproc)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>
> scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
> scp->rproc = rproc;
> @@ -770,21 +768,20 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> +
> scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
> scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>
> /* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base);
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> - return ret;
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> }
> } else {
> scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> @@ -792,10 +789,9 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> + "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
>
> ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.33.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-01 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 12:09 [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use devm variant of rproc_alloc() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Reorder scp_probe() sequence AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-24 12:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-01 18:36 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-02-01 18:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-01 18:36 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-02 9:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-02 9:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-02 9:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-02 17:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-02 17:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-02 17:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220201183612.GC2490199@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.