All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
	<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Alexander.Deucher@amd.com,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt`
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:29:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215072911.GA13892@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215000200.242799-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:50PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v2_3.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c   |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c  |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c        |  6 +-
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c                  | 15 ++++-
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                       | 17 +++--
>  drivers/pci/probe.c                     | 52 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c                    | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.h               |  2 -
>  include/linux/pci.h                     | 25 +-------
>  include/linux/pci_ids.h                 |  3 +
>  14 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

That's an awful lot of additional LoC for what is primarily
a refactoring job with the intent to simplify things.

Honestly this looks like an attempt to fix something that
isn't broken.  Specifically, the is_thunderbolt bit apparently
can't be removed without adding new bits to struct pci_dev.
Not sure if that can be called progress.

Thanks,

Lukas

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" 
	<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS" 
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt`
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:29:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215072911.GA13892@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215000200.242799-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:50PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v2_3.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c   |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c  |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c        |  6 +-
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c                  | 15 ++++-
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                       | 17 +++--
>  drivers/pci/probe.c                     | 52 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c                    | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.h               |  2 -
>  include/linux/pci.h                     | 25 +-------
>  include/linux/pci_ids.h                 |  3 +
>  14 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

That's an awful lot of additional LoC for what is primarily
a refactoring job with the intent to simplify things.

Honestly this looks like an attempt to fix something that
isn't broken.  Specifically, the is_thunderbolt bit apparently
can't be removed without adding new bits to struct pci_dev.
Not sure if that can be called progress.

Thanks,

Lukas

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
	<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Alexander.Deucher@amd.com,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4 00/10] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt`
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:29:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215072911.GA13892@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215000200.242799-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:50PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v2_3.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c   |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c  |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c        |  6 +-
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c                  | 15 ++++-
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                       | 17 +++--
>  drivers/pci/probe.c                     | 52 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c                    | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.h               |  2 -
>  include/linux/pci.h                     | 25 +-------
>  include/linux/pci_ids.h                 |  3 +
>  14 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

That's an awful lot of additional LoC for what is primarily
a refactoring job with the intent to simplify things.

Honestly this looks like an attempt to fix something that
isn't broken.  Specifically, the is_thunderbolt bit apparently
can't be removed without adding new bits to struct pci_dev.
Not sure if that can be called progress.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-15  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-15  0:01 [PATCH v4 00/10] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Add USB4 class definition Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Move `is_thunderbolt` check for lack of command completed to a quirk Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Detect root port of internal USB4 controllers Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI: Detect PCIe root ports for discrete " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] PCI: Move check for old Apple Thunderbolt controllers into a quirk Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] PCI: Drop the `is_thunderbolt` attribute from PCI core Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] drm/amd: drop the use of `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] drm/nouveau: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] drm/radeon: " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:01   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] PCI: drop `pci_is_thunderbolt_attached` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:02   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:02   ` [Nouveau] " Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  0:02   ` Mario Limonciello
2022-02-15  7:29 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-02-15  7:29   ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v4 00/10] Overhaul `is_thunderbolt` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-15  7:29   ` Lukas Wunner
2022-02-15 19:07   ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-15 19:07     ` [Nouveau] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-15 19:07     ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-16 14:34     ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-16 14:34       ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-16 14:34       ` [Nouveau] " Mika Westerberg
2022-02-16 14:34       ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-16 14:44       ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-16 14:44         ` [Nouveau] " Alex Deucher
2022-02-16 14:44         ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-16 16:50         ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-16 16:50           ` [Nouveau] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-16 16:50           ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-17  9:33           ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-17  9:33             ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-17  9:33             ` [Nouveau] " Mika Westerberg
2022-02-17  9:33             ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220215072911.GA13892@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.